Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24812628›Full record

Trial reportBioMed research international2014

High-intensity intermittent swimming improves cardiovascular health status for women with mild hypertension.

Magni Mohr, Nikolai Baastrup Nordsborg, Annika Lindenskov, Hildigunn Steinholm, Hans Petur Nielsen, Jann Mortensen, Pal Weihe, Peter Krustrup

Open access · hybridAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BioMed research international, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 43 papers, 10 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
43citing papers in PubMed, 10 pooled it
21.9field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

43 citing papers in PubMed, 10 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 82 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Group-delivered interventions for lowering blood pressure in hypertension: a systematic review and meta-analysis.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2025
    Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Pooled it
  9. Pooled it
  10. Pooled it
  11. Trial
  12. Trial
  13. Trial
  14. Trial
  15. Trial
  16. Trial
  17. Trial
  18. Trial
  19. Trial
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 4 countries.

Magni MohrSport and Health Sciences, College of Life and Environmental Sciences, St. Luke's Campus, University of Exeter, Exeter EX12LU, UK ; Department of Food and Nutrition, and Sport Sciences, University of Gothenburg, 405 30 Gothenburg, Sweden.
Nikolai Baastrup NordsborgDepartment of Nutrition, Exercise and Sports, Copenhagen Centre for Team Sport and Health, University of Copenhagen, 2100 Copenhagen, Denmark.
Annika LindenskovThe Faroese Confederation of Sports and Olympic Committee, 100 Torshavn, Faroe Islands.
Hildigunn SteinholmDepartment of Nursing, Faculty of Natural and Health Sciences, University of the Faroe Islands, 100 Torshavn, Faroe Islands.
Hans Petur NielsenSouthern Hospital, The Faroese Hospital System, Faroe Islands.
Jann MortensenDepartment of Medicine, The Faroese National Hospital, 100 Torshavn, Faroe Islands ; Department of Clinical Physiology, Nuclear Medicine & PET, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital, 2100 Copenhagen, Denmark.
Pal WeiheDepartment of Occupational Medicine and Public Health, The Faroese Hospital System, 100 Torshavn, Faroe Islands.
Peter KrustrupSport and Health Sciences, College of Life and Environmental Sciences, St. Luke's Campus, University of Exeter, Exeter EX12LU, UK ; Department of Nutrition, Exercise and Sports, Copenhagen Centre for Team Sport and Health, University of Copenhagen, 2100 Copenhagen, Denmark.
University of the Faroe Islands · FOUniversity of Copenhagen · DKCopenhagen University Hospital · DKUniversity of Gothenburg · SE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

To test the hypothesis that high-intensity swim training improves cardiovascular health status in sedentary premenopausal women with mild hypertension, sixty-two women were randomized into high-intensity (n = 21; HIT), moderate-intensity (n = 21; MOD), and control groups (n = 20; CON). HIT performed 6-10 × 30 s all-out swimming interspersed by 2 min recovery and MOD swam continuously for 1 h at moderate intensity for a 15-week period completing in total 44 ± 1 and 43 ± 1 sessions, respectively. In CON, all measured variables were similar before and after the intervention period. Systolic BP decreased (P < 0.05) by 6 ± 1 and 4 ± 1 mmHg in HIT and MOD; respectively. Resting heart rate declined (P < 0.05) by 5 ± 1 bpm both in HIT and MOD, fat mass decreased (P < 0.05) by 1.1 ± 0.2 and 2.2 ± 0.3 kg, respectively, while the blood lipid profile was unaltered. In HIT and MOD, performance improved (P < 0.05) for a maximal 10 min swim (13 ± 3% and 22 ± 3%), interval swimming (23 ± 3% and 8 ± 3%), and Yo-Yo IE1 running performance (58 ± 5% and 45 ± 4%). In conclusion, high-intensity intermittent swimming is an effective training strategy to improve cardiovascular health and physical performance in sedentary women with mild hypertension. Adaptations are similar with high- and moderate-intensity training, despite markedly less total time spent and distance covered in the high-intensity group.

Indexed as

Health StatusAdiposityAdultAnthropometryBlood PressureBody WeightCardiovascular SystemCholesterolDiastoleFemaleHeart RateHumansHypertensionMiddle AgedPhysical EnduranceRestCholesterolTriglycerides

Identifiers

PMID24812628
PMCPMC4000940
OpenAlexW2103238414

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.