Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24812614›Full record

ArticleBioMed research international2014

An intelligent clinical decision support system for patient-specific predictions to improve cervical intraepithelial neoplasia detection.

Panagiotis Bountris, Maria Haritou, Abraham Pouliakis, Niki Margari, Maria Kyrgiou, Aris Spathis, Asimakis Pappas, Ioannis Panayiotides, Evangelos A Paraskevaidis, Petros Karakitsos and 1 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BioMed research international, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.6field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 35 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Management of Atypical Squamous Cell Cases: A Prospective Study of Women seen at a Private Health Service in Northeastern Brazil.Revista brasileira de ginecologia e obstetricia : revista da Federacao Brasileira das Sociedades de Ginecologia e Obstetricia · 2018
    Observational
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Panagiotis BountrisBiomedical Engineering Laboratory, School of Electrical and Computer Engineering, National Technical University of Athens, Iroon Politechniou 9, 15773 Zografou Campus, Athens, Greece.
Maria HaritouInstitute of Communication and Computer Systems, National Technical University of Athens, Iroon Politechniou 9, 15773 Zografou Campus, Athens, Greece.
Abraham PouliakisDepartment of Cytopathology, School of Medicine, University General Hospital "ATTIKON", University of Athens, Rimini 1, 12462 Athens, Greece.
Niki MargariDepartment of Cytopathology, School of Medicine, University General Hospital "ATTIKON", University of Athens, Rimini 1, 12462 Athens, Greece.
Maria KyrgiouWest London Gynaecological Cancer Center, Queen Charlotte's and Chelsea, Hammersmith Hospital, Imperial Healthcare NHS Trust, London W12 0HS, UK ; Division of Surgery and Cancer, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College, London W12 0NN, UK.
Aris SpathisDepartment of Cytopathology, School of Medicine, University General Hospital "ATTIKON", University of Athens, Rimini 1, 12462 Athens, Greece.
Asimakis Pappas3rd Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University General Hospital "ATTIKON", School of Medicine, University of Athens, Rimini 1, 12462 Athens, Greece.
Ioannis Panayiotides2nd Department of Pathology, University General Hospital "ATTIKON", School of Medicine, University of Athens, Rimini 1, 12462 Athens, Greece.
Evangelos A ParaskevaidisDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Hospital of Ioannina, St. Niarchou Str, 45500 Ioannina, Greece.
Petros KarakitsosDepartment of Cytopathology, School of Medicine, University General Hospital "ATTIKON", University of Athens, Rimini 1, 12462 Athens, Greece.
Dimitrios-Dionyssios KoutsourisBiomedical Engineering Laboratory, School of Electrical and Computer Engineering, National Technical University of Athens, Iroon Politechniou 9, 15773 Zografou Campus, Athens, Greece.
National and Kapodistrian University of Athens · GRNational Technical University of Athens · GRImperial College Healthcare NHS Trust · GBUniversity General Hospital Attikon · GRUniversity Hospital of Ioannina · GR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Nowadays, there are molecular biology techniques providing information related to cervical cancer and its cause: the human Papillomavirus (HPV), including DNA microarrays identifying HPV subtypes, mRNA techniques such as nucleic acid based amplification or flow cytometry identifying E6/E7 oncogenes, and immunocytochemistry techniques such as overexpression of p16. Each one of these techniques has its own performance, limitations and advantages, thus a combinatorial approach via computational intelligence methods could exploit the benefits of each method and produce more accurate results. In this article we propose a clinical decision support system (CDSS), composed by artificial neural networks, intelligently combining the results of classic and ancillary techniques for diagnostic accuracy improvement. We evaluated this method on 740 cases with complete series of cytological assessment, molecular tests, and colposcopy examination. The CDSS demonstrated high sensitivity (89.4%), high specificity (97.1%), high positive predictive value (89.4%), and high negative predictive value (97.1%), for detecting cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 2 or worse (CIN2+). In comparison to the tests involved in this study and their combinations, the CDSS produced the most balanced results in terms of sensitivity, specificity, PPV, and NPV. The proposed system may reduce the referral rate for colposcopy and guide personalised management and therapeutic interventions.

Indexed as

Decision Support Systems, ClinicalPrecision MedicineAlgorithmsAtypical Squamous Cells of the CervixDatabases as TopicFemaleHumansNeural Networks, ComputerProbabilityReproducibility of ResultsUterine Cervical Dysplasia

Identifiers

PMID24812614
PMCPMC4000928
OpenAlexW2000145678

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.