Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24812306›Full record

ArticleGenetics2014

Balancing selection in species with separate sexes: insights from Fisher's geometric model.

Tim Connallon, Andrew G Clark

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genetics, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 58 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
58citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

58 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. A century of theories of balancing selection.Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society · 2026
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Fisher's Geometric Model as a Tool to Study Speciation.Cold Spring Harbor perspectives in biology · 2024
    Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Inferring Balancing Selection From Genome-Scale Data.Genome biology and evolution · 2023
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Tim ConnallonDepartment of Molecular Biology and Genetics, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York 14853 tmc233@cornell.edu.
Andrew G ClarkDepartment of Molecular Biology and Genetics, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York 14853.

Funding

TAKASHIMA DIVERSITY SUPPLEMENT TO: REGULATION OF GAMETE USE AND NEURAL PATHWAYS IN REPRODUCTIONR01HD059060 · NICHD · CORNELL UNIVERSITY · PI ANDREW G CLARK, Mariana Federica Wolfner · 2009 to 2026
$5.8M
Molecular Evolution of Drosophila Y ChromosomeR01GM064590 · NIGMS · PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY-UNIV PARK · PI CARVALHO, ANTONIO BERNARDO, CLARK, ANDREW G · 2002 to 2012
$2.0M
NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD059060NIGMS NIH HHS GM64590NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM064590
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

How common is balancing selection, and what fraction of phenotypic variance is attributable to balanced polymorphisms? Despite decades of research, answers to these questions remain elusive. Moreover, there is no clear theoretical prediction about the frequency with which balancing selection is expected to arise within a population. Here, we use an extension of Fisher's geometric model of adaptation to predict the probability of balancing selection in a population with separate sexes, wherein polymorphism is potentially maintained by two forms of balancing selection: (1) heterozygote advantage, where heterozygous individuals at a locus have higher fitness than homozygous individuals, and (2) sexually antagonistic selection (a.k.a. intralocus sexual conflict), where the fitness of each sex is maximized by different genotypes at a locus. We show that balancing selection is common under biologically plausible conditions and that sex differences in selection or sex-by-genotype effects of mutations can each increase opportunities for balancing selection. Although heterozygote advantage and sexual antagonism represent alternative mechanisms for maintaining polymorphism, they mutually exist along a balancing selection continuum that depends on population and sex-specific parameters of selection and mutation. Sexual antagonism is the dominant mode of balancing selection across most of this continuum.

Indexed as

Models, GeneticSelection, GeneticSex CharacteristicsAnimalsFemaleGenetic FitnessGenotypeMaleMutationSpecies Specificityheterozygote advantageintralocus sexual conflictmaintenance of polymorphismpleiotropysexual antagonism

Identifiers

PMID24812306
PMCPMC4096376

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.