Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24811940›Full record

SynthesisIntensive care medicine2014

Association between tidal volume size, duration of ventilation, and sedation needs in patients without acute respiratory distress syndrome: an individual patient data meta-analysis.

Ary Serpa Neto, Fabienne D Simonis, Carmen S V Barbas, Michelle Biehl, Rogier M Determann, Jonathan Elmer, Gilberto Friedman, Ognjen Gajic, Joshua N Goldstein, Janneke Horn and 9 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract readMeta-AnalysisReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Intensive care medicine, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03909854 (Pragmatic Investigation of Volume Targeted Ventilation-1), which is not on this map. Cited by 60 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
60citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03909854 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2019, after this paper: background citation

Pragmatic Investigation of Volume Targeted Ventilation-1 (PIVOT-1)

TypeinterventionalSponsorWake Forest University Health SciencesRan2019 to 2020Enrolled139ConditionsRespiratory Failure, Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (ARDS), Ventilator LungArmsmode of mechanical ventilation
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

60 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. [S3 Guideline Sepsis-prevention, diagnosis, therapy, and aftercare : Long version].Medizinische Klinik, Intensivmedizin und Notfallmedizin · 2020
    Guideline
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Article
  9. Observational
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Observational
  16. Article
  17. Fat embolism syndrome.BJA education · 2021
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

19 authors.

Ary Serpa NetoDepartment of Intensive Care, Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, aryserpa@terra.com.br.
Fabienne D Simonis
Carmen S V Barbas
Michelle Biehl
Rogier M Determann
Jonathan Elmer
Gilberto Friedman
Ognjen Gajic
Joshua N Goldstein
Janneke Horn
Nicole P Juffermans
Rita Linko
Roselaine Pinheiro de Oliveira
Sugantha Sundar
Daniel Talmor
Esther K Wolthuis
Marcelo Gama de Abreu
Paolo Pelosi
Marcus J Schultz

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeMechanical ventilation with lower tidal volumes (≤6 ml/kg of predicted body weight, PBW) could benefit patients without acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). However, tidal volume reduction could be associated with increased patient discomfort and sedation needs, and consequent longer duration of ventilation. The aim of this individual patient data meta-analysis was to assess the associations between tidal volume size, duration of mechanical ventilation, and sedation needs in patients without ARDS.

methodsStudies comparing ventilation with different tidal volume sizes in patients without ARDS were screened for inclusion. Corresponding authors were asked to provide individual participant data. Patients were assigned to three groups based on tidal volume size (≤6 ml/kg PBW, 6-10 ml/kg PBW, or ≥10 ml/kg PBW). Ventilator-free days, alive at day 28, and dose and duration of sedation (propofol and midazolam), analgesia (fentanyl and morphine), and neuromuscular blockade (NMB) were compared.

resultsSeven investigations (2,184 patients) were included in the analysis. The number of patients breathing without assistance by day 28 was higher in the group ventilated with tidal volume ≤6 ml/kg PBW compared to those ventilated with tidal volume ≥10 ml/kg PBW (93.1 vs. 88.6%; p = 0.027, respectively). Only two investigations (187 patients) could be included in the meta-analysis of sedation needs. There were neither differences in the percentage of study days that patients received sedatives, opioids, or NMBA nor in the total dose of benzodiazepines, propofol, opioids, and NMBA.

conclusionsThis meta-analysis suggests that use of lower tidal volumes in patients without ARDS at the onset of mechanical ventilation could be associated with shorter duration of ventilation. Use of lower tidal volumes seems not to affect sedation or analgesia needs, but this must be confirmed in a robust, well-powered randomized controlled trial.

Indexed as

Tidal VolumeAnalgesics, OpioidFentanylHumansHypnotics and SedativesIntensive Care UnitsLength of StayMidazolamMorphineNeuromuscular BlockadePropofolRespiration, ArtificialTime FactorsAnalgesics, OpioidFentanylHypnotics and SedativesMidazolamMorphinePropofol

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.