ArticleNature biotechnology2014
iGEM 2.0--refoundations for engineering biology.
Article in Nature biotechnology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 39 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
39 citing papers in PubMed.
- Expanding global access to synthetic biology.Nature biotechnology · 2026Article
- Core elements play distinct roles in promoter birth and transcriptional regulation.Nature communications · 2026Article
- Synthetic Biology of Plants and Microbes for Agriculture, Environment, and Future Applications.Chemical reviews · 2026Review
- DSCI: a database of synthetic biology components for innate immunity and cell engineering decision-making processes.Advanced biotechnology · 2024Article
- Measuring the burden of hundreds of BioBricks defines an evolutionary limit on constructability in synthetic biology.Nature communications · 2024Article
- An integrative database and its application for plant synthetic biology research.Plant communications · 2024Article
- Measuring the burden of hundreds of BioBricks defines an evolutionary limit on constructability in synthetic biology.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024Article
- At-Home, Cell-Free Synthetic Biology Education Modules for Transcriptional Regulation and Environmental Water Quality Monitoring.ACS synthetic biology · 2023Article
- Advancing reuse of genetic parts: progress and remaining challenges.Nature communications · 2023Article
- At-home, cell-free synthetic biology education modules for transcriptional regulation and environmental water quality monitoring.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2023Article
- An economy of details: standards and data reusability.Synthetic biology (Oxford, England) · 2023Article
- Editorial for "Special Issue on the 2019 and 2020 iGEM proceedings".Synthetic and systems biotechnology · 2022Article
- Bottlenecks and opportunities for synthetic biology biosafety standards.Nature communications · 2022Article
- Ten simple rules for building an enthusiastic iGEM team.PLoS computational biology · 2022Article
- The BioExperience Research and Entrepreneurship Challenge: An iGEM-inspired applied research program for BIOSTEM talent and skills development.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2022Article
- iGEM 2021: A Year in Review.Biodesign research · 2022Review
- Can thiol-based redox systems be utilized as parts for synthetic biology applications?Redox report : communications in free radical research · 2021Article
- iGEM comes of age: trends in its research output.Nature biotechnology · 2021Article
- pLannotate: engineered plasmid annotation.Nucleic acids research · 2021Article
- BioMaster: An Integrated Database and Analytic Platform to Provide Comprehensive Information About BioBrick Parts.Frontiers in microbiology · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Indexed as
Identifiers
24811510What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.