Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24811344›Full record

ArticlePLoS genetics2014

Extensive diversity of prion strains is defined by differential chaperone interactions and distinct amyloidogenic regions.

Kevin C Stein, Heather L True

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS genetics, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 41 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Mapping of Prion Structures in the Yeast Rnq1.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Article
  2. How Big Is the Yeast Prion Universe?International journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Structural Bases of Prion Variation in Yeast.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Kevin C SteinDepartment of Cell Biology and Physiology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri, United States of America.
Heather L TrueDepartment of Cell Biology and Physiology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri, United States of America.
Washington University in St. Louis · US

Funding

A PRION REVEALS COMPLEX TRAITS AND PHENOTYPIC DIVERSITYR01GM072778 · NIGMS · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI TRUE-KROB, HEATHER L · 2005 to 2014
$3.1M
Elucidating factors involved in formation and propagation of yeast prion strainsF31AG040899 · NIA · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI STEIN, KEVIN C · 2011 to 2012
$56k
NIA NIH HHS F31 AG040899NIA NIH HHS F31AG040899NIGMS NIH HHS GM072778NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM072778
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Amyloidogenic proteins associated with a variety of unrelated diseases are typically capable of forming several distinct self-templating conformers. In prion diseases, these different structures, called prion strains (or variants), confer dramatic variation in disease pathology and transmission. Aggregate stability has been found to be a key determinant of the diverse pathological consequences of different prion strains. Yet, it remains largely unclear what other factors might account for the widespread phenotypic variation seen with aggregation-prone proteins. Here, we examined a set of yeast prion variants of the [RNQ+] prion that differ in their ability to induce the formation of another yeast prion called [PSI+]. Remarkably, we found that the [RNQ+] variants require different, non-contiguous regions of the Rnq1 protein for both prion propagation and [PSI+] induction. This included regions outside of the canonical prion-forming domain of Rnq1. Remarkably, such differences did not result in variation in aggregate stability. Our analysis also revealed a striking difference in the ability of these [RNQ+] variants to interact with the chaperone Sis1. Thus, our work shows that the differential influence of various amyloidogenic regions and interactions with host cofactors are critical determinants of the phenotypic consequences of distinct aggregate structures. This helps reveal the complex interdependent factors that influence how a particular amyloid structure may dictate disease pathology and progression.

Indexed as

AmyloidElectrophoresis, Polyacrylamide GelMolecular ChaperonesPrionsProtein ConformationAmyloidMolecular ChaperonesPrions

Identifiers

PMID24811344
PMCPMC4014422
OpenAlexW2060328209

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.