ArticlePLoS computational biology2014
A computational framework for analyzing stochasticity in gene expression.
Article in PLoS computational biology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed, 25 citations in OpenAlex.
- Systems biology during 20 years of PLoS Computational Biology.PLoS computational biology · 2026Article
- Proteomic aging clocks in epidemiological studies: advances, applications and prospects.Nature aging · 2026Review
- Chronic arsenic exposure induces malignant transformation of human HaCaT cells through both deterministic and stochastic changes in transcriptome expression.Toxicology and applied pharmacology · 2024Article
- Activation domains can decouple the mean and noise of gene expression.Cell reports · 2022Article
- A scalable, open-source implementation of a large-scale mechanistic model for single cell proliferation and death signaling.Nature communications · 2022Article
- Exponential equilibration of genetic circuits using entropy methods.Journal of mathematical biology · 2019Article
- A mechanistic pan-cancer pathway model informed by multi-omics data interprets stochastic cell fate responses to drugs and mitogens.PLoS computational biology · 2018Article
- Discontinuous transcription.Nucleus (Austin, Tex.) · 2018Review
- Fluctuations of pol I and fibrillarin contents of the nucleoli.Nucleus (Austin, Tex.) · 2017Article
- Intercellular Variability in Protein Levels from Stochastic Expression and Noisy Cell Cycle Processes.PLoS computational biology · 2016Article
- A moment-convergence method for stochastic analysis of biochemical reaction networks.The Journal of chemical physics · 2016Article
- Cell-to-cell variability in the propensity to transcribe explains correlated fluctuations in gene expression.Cell systems · 2015Article
- Probing the effect of promoters on noise in gene expression using thousands of designed sequences.Genome research · 2014Article
- Modeling dynamics of cell-to-cell variability in TRAIL-induced apoptosis explains fractional killing and predicts reversible resistance.PLoS computational biology · 2014Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Stochastic fluctuations in gene expression give rise to distributions of protein levels across cell populations. Despite a mounting number of theoretical models explaining stochasticity in protein expression, we lack a robust, efficient, assumption-free approach for inferring the molecular mechanisms that underlie the shape of protein distributions. Here we propose a method for inferring sets of biochemical rate constants that govern chromatin modification, transcription, translation, and RNA and protein degradation from stochasticity in protein expression. We asked whether the rates of these underlying processes can be estimated accurately from protein expression distributions, in the absence of any limiting assumptions. To do this, we (1) derived analytical solutions for the first four moments of the protein distribution, (2) found that these four moments completely capture the shape of protein distributions, and (3) developed an efficient algorithm for inferring gene expression rate constants from the moments of protein distributions. Using this algorithm we find that most protein distributions are consistent with a large number of different biochemical rate constant sets. Despite this degeneracy, the solution space of rate constants almost always informs on underlying mechanism. For example, we distinguish between regimes where transcriptional bursting occurs from regimes reflecting constitutive transcript production. Our method agrees with the current standard approach, and in the restrictive regime where the standard method operates, also identifies rate constants not previously obtainable. Even without making any assumptions we obtain estimates of individual biochemical rate constants, or meaningful ratios of rate constants, in 91% of tested cases. In some cases our method identified all of the underlying rate constants. The framework developed here will be a powerful tool for deducing the contributions of particular molecular mechanisms to specific patterns of gene expression.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.