Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24810747›Full record

ArticlePloS one2014

Directed evolution of improved zinc finger methyltransferases.

Brian Chaikind, Marc Ostermeier

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 30 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Editing DNA Methylation in Mammalian Embryos.International journal of molecular sciences · 2020
    Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Advances in the directed evolution of proteins.Current opinion in chemical biology · 2014
    Review
  17. Epigenetic mechanisms underlying the pathogenesis of neurogenetic diseases.Neurotherapeutics : the journal of the American Society for Experimental NeuroTherapeutics · 2014
    Review
  18. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Brian ChaikindChemistry-Biology Interface Graduate Program, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland, United States of America.
Marc OstermeierDepartment of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland, United States of America.
Johns Hopkins University · US

Funding

The Combinatorial Design of Protein Molecular SwitchesR01GM066972 · NIGMS · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI OSTERMEIER, MARC A · 2003 to 2016
$4.0M
The Chemistry-Biology Interface Program at Johns Hopkins UniversityT32GM080189 · NIGMS · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI ROKITA, STEVEN E · 2008 to 2022
$3.5M
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM066972NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM080189
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The ability to target DNA methylation toward a single, user-designated CpG site in vivo may have wide applicability for basic biological and biomedical research. A tool for targeting methylation toward single sites could be used to study the effects of individual methylation events on transcription, protein recruitment to DNA, and the dynamics of such epigenetic alterations. Although various tools for directing methylation to promoters exist, none offers the ability to localize methylation solely to a single CpG site. In our ongoing research to create such a tool, we have pursued a strategy employing artificially bifurcated DNA methyltransferases; each methyltransferase fragment is fused to zinc finger proteins with affinity for sequences flanking a targeted CpG site for methylation. We sought to improve the targeting of these enzymes by reducing the methyltransferase activity at non-targeted sites while maintaining high levels of activity at a targeted site. Here we demonstrate an in vitro directed evolution selection strategy to improve methyltransferase specificity and use it to optimize an engineered zinc finger methyltransferase derived from M.SssI. The unusual restriction enzyme McrBC is a key component of this strategy and is used to select against methyltransferases that methylate multiple sites on a plasmid. This strategy allowed us to quickly identify mutants with high levels of methylation at the target site (up to ∼80%) and nearly unobservable levels of methylation at a off-target sites (<1%), as assessed in E. coli. We also demonstrate that replacing the zinc finger domains with new zinc fingers redirects the methylation to a new target CpG site flanked by the corresponding zinc finger binding sequences.

Indexed as

Zinc FingersBinding SitesDirected Molecular EvolutionGene LibraryMethylationMethyltransferasesMutationMethyltransferases

Identifiers

PMID24810747
PMCPMC4014571
OpenAlexW2002402255

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.