Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24810687›Full record

ArticleGenetics in medicine : official journal of the American College of Medical Genetics2014

Genome-wide karyomapping accurately identifies the inheritance of single-gene defects in human preimplantation embryos in vitro.

Senthilkumar A Natesan, Alex J Bladon, Serdar Coskun, Wafa Qubbaj, Renata Prates, Santiago Munne, Edith Coonen, Joseph C F M Dreesen, Servi J C Stevens, Aimee D C Paulussen and 6 more

Abstract readComparative StudyMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Genetics in medicine : official journal of the American College of Medical Genetics, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 77 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
77citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

77 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Observational
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Preimplantation genetic testing in the current era, a review.Archives of gynecology and obstetrics · 2024
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review

17 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors.

Senthilkumar A NatesanIllumina, Cambridge, UK.
Alex J BladonIllumina, Cambridge, UK.
Serdar CoskunDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Center, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Wafa QubbajDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Center, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Renata PratesReprogenetics, Livingston, New Jersey, USA.
Santiago MunneReprogenetics, Livingston, New Jersey, USA.
Edith Coonen1] Centre for Reproductive Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, The Netherlands [2] GROW, School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, University of Maastricht, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Joseph C F M Dreesen1] GROW, School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, University of Maastricht, Maastricht, The Netherlands [2] Department of Clinical Genetics, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Servi J C Stevens1] GROW, School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, University of Maastricht, Maastricht, The Netherlands [2] Department of Clinical Genetics, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Aimee D C Paulussen1] GROW, School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, University of Maastricht, Maastricht, The Netherlands [2] Department of Clinical Genetics, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Sharyn E Stock-MyerPreimplantation Genetics, Melbourne IVF, East Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Leeanda J WiltonPreimplantation Genetics, Melbourne IVF, East Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Souraya JaroudiReprogenetics UK, Institute of Reproductive Sciences, Oxford, UK.
Dagan WellsReprogenetics UK, Institute of Reproductive Sciences, Oxford, UK.
Anthony P C BrownIllumina, Cambridge, UK.
Alan H Handyside1] Illumina, Cambridge, UK [2] The Bridge Centre, London, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeOur aim was to compare the accuracy of family- or disease-specific targeted haplotyping and direct mutation-detection strategies with the accuracy of genome-wide mapping of the parental origin of each chromosome, or karyomapping, by single-nucleotide polymorphism genotyping of the parents, a close relative of known disease status, and the embryo cell(s) used for preimplantation genetic diagnosis of single-gene defects in a single cell or small numbers of cells biopsied from human embryos following in vitro fertilization.

methodsGenomic DNA and whole-genome amplification products from embryo samples, which were previously diagnosed by targeted haplotyping, were genotyped for single-nucleotide polymorphisms genome-wide detection and retrospectively analyzed blind by karyomapping.

resultsSingle-nucleotide polymorphism genotyping and karyomapping were successful in 213/218 (97.7%) samples from 44 preimplantation genetic diagnosis cycles for 25 single-gene defects with various modes of inheritance distributed widely across the genome. Karyomapping was concordant with targeted haplotyping in 208 (97.7%) samples, and the five nonconcordant samples were all in consanguineous regions with limited or inconsistent haplotyping results.

conclusionGenome-wide karyomapping is highly accurate and facilitates analysis of the inheritance of almost any single-gene defect, or any combination of loci, at the single-cell level, greatly expanding the range of conditions for which preimplantation genetic diagnosis can be offered clinically without the need for customized test development.

Indexed as

BlastocystChromosome MappingFemaleGenome, HumanGenotyping TechniquesHumansIn Vitro TechniquesKaryotypingMaleParentsPolymorphism, Single NucleotidePreimplantation DiagnosisReproducibility of ResultsRetrospective Studies

Identifiers

PMID24810687
PMCPMC4225458

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.