ArticleMedical hypotheses2014
Muscle as a molecular machine for protecting joints and bones by absorbing mechanical impacts.
Article in Medical hypotheses, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 27 citations in OpenAlex.
- Electrical stimulation reduces post-exercise muscle stiffness and enhances flexibility in hamstring muscles.European journal of applied physiology · 2026Article
- Association of computed tomography-based radiodensity of the peri-hip muscles with hip fracture type and severity: a retrospective study in middle-aged and elderly patients.BMC musculoskeletal disorders · 2026Article
- Real-World Clinical Outcomes of Polydioxanone Filament Insertion into the Vastus Medialis Obliquus for Knee Osteoarthritis: A Retrospective Observational Study.Journal of pain research · 2026Article
- Chronic and acute mediators of passive viscoelasticity in human skeletal muscle fibres.Experimental physiology · 2025Article
- Correlation between knee pain and quadriceps condition in osteoarthritis rats treated with cog polydioxanone filaments.The Korean journal of pain · 2025Article
- Neurophysiology of ACL Injury.Orthopedic reviews · 2025Article
- Characteristics, Relationships, and Differences in Muscle Activity and Impact Load Attenuation During Tennis Forehand Stroke with Different Grips.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Quadriceps recovery and pain relief in knee osteoarthritis rats by cog polydioxanone filament insertion.Regenerative biomaterials · 2024Article
- Biomechanical Process of Skeletal Muscle under Training Condition Based on 3D Visualization Technology.Journal of healthcare engineering · 2022Article
- How muscle stiffness affects human body model behavior.Biomedical engineering online · 2021Article
- Article
- Running Mechanics After Repeated Sprints in Femoroacetabular Impingement Syndrome, Cam Morphology, and Controls.Sports healthArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
We hypothesize that dissipation of mechanical energy of external impact to absorb mechanical shock is a fundamental function of skeletal muscle in addition to its primary function to convert chemical energy into mechanical energy. In physical systems, the common mechanism for absorbing mechanical shock is achieved with the use of both elastic and viscous elements and we hypothesize that the viscosity of the skeletal muscle is a variable parameter which can be voluntarily controlled by changing the tension of the contracting muscle. We further hypothesize that an ability of muscle to absorb shock has been an important factor in biological evolution, allowing the life to move from the ocean to land, from hydrodynamic to aerodynamic environment with dramatically different loading conditions for musculoskeletal system. The ability of muscle to redistribute the energy of mechanical shock in time and space and unload skeletal joints is of key importance in physical activities. We developed a mathematical model explaining the absorption of mechanical shock energy due to the increased viscosity of contracting skeletal muscles. The developed model, based on the classical theory of sliding filaments, demonstrates that the increased muscle viscosity is a result of the time delay (or phase shift) between the mechanical impact and the attachment/detachment of myosin heads to binding sites on the actin filaments. The increase in the contracted muscle's viscosity is time dependent. Since the forward and backward rate constants for binding the myosin heads to the actin filaments are on the order of 100s(-1), the viscosity of the contracted muscle starts to significantly increase with an impact time greater than 0.01s. The impact time is one of the key parameters in generating destructive stress in the colliding objects. In order to successfully dampen a short high power impact, muscles must first slow it down to engage the molecular mechanism of muscle viscosity. Muscle carries out two functions, acting first as a nonlinear spring to slow down impact and second as a viscous damper to absorb the impact. Exploring the ability of muscle to absorb mechanical shock may shed light to many problems of medical biomechanics and sports medicine. Currently there are no clinical devices for real-time quantitative assessment of viscoelastic properties of contracting muscles in vivo. Such assessment may be important for diagnosis and monitoring of treatment of various muscle disorders such as muscle dystrophy, motor neuron diseases, inflammatory and metabolic myopathies and many more.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.