ArticlePLoS computational biology2014
Axonal noise as a source of synaptic variability.
Article in PLoS computational biology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
17 citing papers in PubMed, 41 citations in OpenAlex.
- Motor automaticity in natural keyboard typing.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- Metaplastic sleep regulation inbioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- Serotonergic Signaling Rewired: A Lipid Raft-Controlled Model of Synaptic Transmission Grounded in the Fundamental Parameters of Biological Systems.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Article
- The computational power of the human brain.Frontiers in cellular neuroscience · 2023Review
- Advances in the study of axon-associated vesicles.Frontiers in molecular neuroscience · 2022Review
- Analog transmission of action potential fine structure in spiral ganglion axons.Journal of neurophysiology · 2021Article
- Mechanism behind the neuronal ephaptic coupling during synchronizing by specific brain-triggered wave as neuronal motor toolkit.Scientific reports · 2021Article
- Swallowing Pressure Variability as a Function of Pharyngeal Region, Bolus Volume, Age, and Sex.The Laryngoscope · 2021Article
- Acute Effects of Two Different Species of Amyloid-Neural plasticity · 2020Article
- Past and Future of Analog-Digital Modulation of Synaptic Transmission.Frontiers in cellular neuroscience · 2019Review
- Estimating the Readily-Releasable Vesicle Pool Size at Synaptic Connections in the Neocortex.Frontiers in synaptic neuroscience · 2019Article
- Axonal Computations.Frontiers in cellular neuroscience · 2019Review
- Methods for measuring swallowing pressure variability using high-resolution manometry.Frontiers in applied mathematics and statistics · 2018Article
- Article
- Weak electric fields detectability in a noisy neural network.Cognitive neurodynamics · 2017Article
- Volterra dendritic stimulus processors and biophysical spike generators with intrinsic noise sources.Frontiers in computational neuroscience · 2014Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Post-synaptic potential (PSP) variability is typically attributed to mechanisms inside synapses, yet recent advances in experimental methods and biophysical understanding have led us to reconsider the role of axons as highly reliable transmission channels. We show that in many thin axons of our brain, the action potential (AP) waveform and thus the Ca++ signal controlling vesicle release at synapses will be significantly affected by the inherent variability of ion channel gating. We investigate how and to what extent fluctuations in the AP waveform explain observed PSP variability. Using both biophysical theory and stochastic simulations of central and peripheral nervous system axons from vertebrates and invertebrates, we show that channel noise in thin axons (<1 µm diameter) causes random fluctuations in AP waveforms. AP height and width, both experimentally characterised parameters of post-synaptic response amplitude, vary e.g. by up to 20 mV and 0.5 ms while a single AP propagates in C-fibre axons. We show how AP height and width variabilities increase with a ¾ power-law as diameter decreases and translate these fluctuations into post-synaptic response variability using biophysical data and models of synaptic transmission. We find for example that for mammalian unmyelinated axons with 0.2 µm diameter (matching cerebellar parallel fibres) axonal noise alone can explain half of the PSP variability in cerebellar synapses. We conclude that axonal variability may have considerable impact on synaptic response variability. Thus, in many experimental frameworks investigating synaptic transmission through paired-cell recordings or extracellular stimulation of presynaptic neurons, causes of variability may have been confounded. We thereby show how bottom-up aggregation of molecular noise sources contributes to our understanding of variability observed at higher levels of biological organisation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.