Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24809777›Full record

ArticleBritish journal of cancer2014

Clinicopathologic and prognostic significance of c-MYC copy number gain in lung adenocarcinomas.

A N Seo, J M Yang, H Kim, S Jheon, K Kim, C T Lee, Y Jin, S Yun, J-H Chung, J H Paik

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in British journal of cancer, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 47 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
47citing papers in PubMed
5.1field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

47 citing papers in PubMed, 80 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Digital PCR for the Analysis ofDisease markers · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

A N Seo1] Department of Pathology, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, 300 Gumi-dong, Bundang-gu, Seongnam, Gyeonggi 463-707, Korea [2] Department of Pathology, Kyungpook National University College of Medicine, 680 Gukchaebosang-ro, Jung-gu, Daegu 700-842, Korea.
J M YangDepartment of Pathology, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, 300 Gumi-dong, Bundang-gu, Seongnam, Gyeonggi 463-707, Korea.
H Kim1] Department of Pathology, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, 300 Gumi-dong, Bundang-gu, Seongnam, Gyeonggi 463-707, Korea [2] Department of Pathology, Seoul National University College of Medicine, 28 Yeongon-dong, Jongno-gu, Seoul 110-799, Korea.
S Jheon1] Department of Thoracic Surgery, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, 300 Gumi-dong, Bundang-gu, Seongnam, Gyeonggi 463-707, Korea [2] Department of Thoracic Surgery, Seoul National University College of Medicine, 28 Yeongon-dong, Jongno-gu, Seoul 110-799, Korea.
K Kim1] Department of Thoracic Surgery, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, 300 Gumi-dong, Bundang-gu, Seongnam, Gyeonggi 463-707, Korea [2] Department of Thoracic Surgery, Seoul National University College of Medicine, 28 Yeongon-dong, Jongno-gu, Seoul 110-799, Korea.
C T Lee1] Department of Internal medicine, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, 300 Gumi-dong, Bundang-gu, Seongnam, Gyeonggi 463-707, Korea [2] Department of Internal medicine, Seoul National University College of Medicine, 28 Yeongon-dong, Jongno-gu, Seoul 110-799, Korea.
Y Jin1] Department of Pathology, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, 300 Gumi-dong, Bundang-gu, Seongnam, Gyeonggi 463-707, Korea [2] Department of Pathology, Seoul National University College of Medicine, 28 Yeongon-dong, Jongno-gu, Seoul 110-799, Korea.
S Yun1] Department of Pathology, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, 300 Gumi-dong, Bundang-gu, Seongnam, Gyeonggi 463-707, Korea [2] Department of Pathology, Seoul National University College of Medicine, 28 Yeongon-dong, Jongno-gu, Seoul 110-799, Korea.
J-H Chung1] Department of Pathology, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, 300 Gumi-dong, Bundang-gu, Seongnam, Gyeonggi 463-707, Korea [2] Department of Pathology, Seoul National University College of Medicine, 28 Yeongon-dong, Jongno-gu, Seoul 110-799, Korea.
J H Paik1] Department of Pathology, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, 300 Gumi-dong, Bundang-gu, Seongnam, Gyeonggi 463-707, Korea [2] Department of Pathology, Seoul National University College of Medicine, 28 Yeongon-dong, Jongno-gu, Seoul 110-799, Korea.
Seoul National University Bundang Hospital · KRSeoul National University · KR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundc-MYC copy number gain (c-MYC gain) has been associated with aggressive behaviour in several cancers. However, the role of c-MYC gain has not yet been determined in lung adenocarcinomas classified by genetic alterations in epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR), KRAS, and anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) genes. We investigated the clinicopathologic and prognostic significance of c-MYC gain for disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) according to EGFR, KRAS, and ALK gene status and stages in lung adenocarcinomas.

methodsIn 255 adenocarcinomas resected in Seoul National University Bundang Hospital from 2003 to 2009, fluorescence in situ hybridisation (FISH) with c-MYC probe and centromeric enumeration probe 8 (CEP8) was analysed using tissue microarray containing single representative core per each case. EGFR (codon 18 to 21) and KRAS (codon 12, 13, and 61) mutations were analysed by polymerase chain reaction and direct sequencing method from formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tissue sections. ALK rearrangement was determined by FISH method. c-MYC gain was defined as >2 copies per nucleus, chromosome 8 gain as ⩾3 copies per nucleus, and gain of c-MYC:CEP8 ratio (hereafter, c-MYC amplification) as ⩾2.

resultsWe observed c-MYC gain in 20% (51 out of 255), chromosome 8 gain in 5.5% (14 out of 255), c-MYC amplification in 2.4% (6 out of 255), EGFR mutation in 49.4% (118 out of 239), KRAS mutation in 5.7% (7 out of 123), and ALK rearrangement in 4.9% (10 out of 205) of lung adenocarcinomas. c-MYC gain was observed in 19% (22 out of 118) of patients with lung adenocarcinomas with an EGFR mutation, but not in any patients with a KRAS mutation, or an ALK rearrangement. c-MYC gain (but not chromosome 8 gain or c-MYC amplification) was an independent poor-prognostic factor in the full cohort of lung adenocarcinoma (P=0.022, hazard ratio (HR)=1.71, 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.08-2.69 for DFS; P=0.032, HR=2.04, 95% CI, 1.06-3.91 for OS), as well as in stage I subgroup (P=0.023, HR=4.70, 95% CI, 1.24-17.78 for DFS; P=0.031, HR=4.65, 95% CI, 1.15-18.81 for OS), and in EGFR-mutant subgroup (P=0.022; HR=2.14; 95% CI, 1.11-4.10 for DFS).

conclusionsc-MYC gain (but not chromosome 8 gain or c-MYC amplification) was an independent poor-prognostic factor for DFS and OS in lung adenocarcinomas, both in full cohort and stage I cancer, and possibly for DFS in EGFR-mutant adenocarcinomas. Additional studies are required to determine if patients with lung adenocarcinoma with c-MYC gain are candidates for additional first-line treatment to mitigate their increased risk for disease progression and death.

Indexed as

Gene AmplificationAdenocarcinomaAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAnaplastic Lymphoma KinaseChromosomes, Human, Pair 8Disease-Free SurvivalDNA Copy Number VariationsErbB ReceptorsFemaleGene DosageGenetic Association StudiesHumansKaplan-Meier EstimateLung NeoplasmsALK protein, humanAnaplastic Lymphoma KinaseEGFR protein, humanErbB ReceptorsKRAS protein, humanMYC protein, humanProto-Oncogene ProteinsProto-Oncogene Proteins c-mycProto-Oncogene Proteins p21(ras)ras ProteinsReceptor Protein-Tyrosine Kinases

Identifiers

PMID24809777
PMCPMC4037828
OpenAlexW1992073257

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.