ArticleBritish journal of cancer2014
Clinicopathologic and prognostic significance of c-MYC copy number gain in lung adenocarcinomas.
Article in British journal of cancer, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 47 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
47 citing papers in PubMed, 80 citations in OpenAlex.
- Trial
- Osimertinib Resistance in EGFR-Mutated Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: Mechanisms and Therapeutic Strategies.MedComm · 2026Review
- Prognostic impact of c-MYC and EZH2 expression in small cell and non-small cell lung carcinoma: a single-center retrospective study.Discover oncology · 2026Article
- Myc-mediated epigenetic silencing of ACAP3 promotes lung adenocarcinoma proliferation via regulating EGFR dynamics.British journal of cancer · 2026Article
- Divergent outcomes of neoadjuvant therapy for locally advanced small-cell lung cancer: two cases report and literature review.Discover oncology · 2025Article
- Phytochemical profiling and anticancer potential of pistachio wastes against MCF-7 breast cancer cells: a metabolic and apoptotic pathway analysis.BMC complementary medicine and therapies · 2025Article
- Rapid DNA and RNA isolation from few or single cells using low-cost NAxtra magnetic nanoparticles.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- The dual HDAC/PI3K inhibitor CUDC-907 inhibits the growth and proliferation of MYC-driven Group 3 medulloblastoma.Cell death discovery · 2025Article
- Assessment of MYC and TERT copy number variations in lung cancer using digital PCR.BMC research notes · 2023Article
- Article
- USP28 enables oncogenic transformation of respiratory cells, and its inhibition potentiates molecular therapy targeting mutant EGFR, BRAF and PI3K.Molecular oncology · 2022Article
- Antioxidant Systems, lncRNAs, and Tunneling Nanotubes in Cell Death Rescue from Cigarette Smoke Exposure.Cells · 2022Review
- Expression and Prognostic Significance of c-Myc, ALK, ROS1, BRAF, and PD-L1 Among Patients With Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer.Clinical Medicine Insights. Oncology · 2022Article
- Identifying a 6-Gene Prognostic Signature for Lung Adenocarcinoma Based on Copy Number Variation and Gene Expression Data.Oxidative medicine and cellular longevity · 2022Article
- Discovery of the first chemical tools to regulate MKK3-mediated MYC activation in cancer.Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry · 2021Article
- Article
- A novel TRPM7/O-GlcNAc axis mediates tumour cell motility and metastasis by stabilising c-Myc and caveolin-1 in lung carcinoma.British journal of cancer · 2020Article
- Impact of concurrent genomic alterations in epidermal growth factor receptor (Journal of thoracic disease · 2020Review
- Protein phosphatase 2A activation as a therapeutic strategy for managing MYC-driven cancers.The Journal of biological chemistry · 2020Article
- Digital PCR for the Analysis ofDisease markers · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundc-MYC copy number gain (c-MYC gain) has been associated with aggressive behaviour in several cancers. However, the role of c-MYC gain has not yet been determined in lung adenocarcinomas classified by genetic alterations in epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR), KRAS, and anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) genes. We investigated the clinicopathologic and prognostic significance of c-MYC gain for disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) according to EGFR, KRAS, and ALK gene status and stages in lung adenocarcinomas.
methodsIn 255 adenocarcinomas resected in Seoul National University Bundang Hospital from 2003 to 2009, fluorescence in situ hybridisation (FISH) with c-MYC probe and centromeric enumeration probe 8 (CEP8) was analysed using tissue microarray containing single representative core per each case. EGFR (codon 18 to 21) and KRAS (codon 12, 13, and 61) mutations were analysed by polymerase chain reaction and direct sequencing method from formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tissue sections. ALK rearrangement was determined by FISH method. c-MYC gain was defined as >2 copies per nucleus, chromosome 8 gain as ⩾3 copies per nucleus, and gain of c-MYC:CEP8 ratio (hereafter, c-MYC amplification) as ⩾2.
resultsWe observed c-MYC gain in 20% (51 out of 255), chromosome 8 gain in 5.5% (14 out of 255), c-MYC amplification in 2.4% (6 out of 255), EGFR mutation in 49.4% (118 out of 239), KRAS mutation in 5.7% (7 out of 123), and ALK rearrangement in 4.9% (10 out of 205) of lung adenocarcinomas. c-MYC gain was observed in 19% (22 out of 118) of patients with lung adenocarcinomas with an EGFR mutation, but not in any patients with a KRAS mutation, or an ALK rearrangement. c-MYC gain (but not chromosome 8 gain or c-MYC amplification) was an independent poor-prognostic factor in the full cohort of lung adenocarcinoma (P=0.022, hazard ratio (HR)=1.71, 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.08-2.69 for DFS; P=0.032, HR=2.04, 95% CI, 1.06-3.91 for OS), as well as in stage I subgroup (P=0.023, HR=4.70, 95% CI, 1.24-17.78 for DFS; P=0.031, HR=4.65, 95% CI, 1.15-18.81 for OS), and in EGFR-mutant subgroup (P=0.022; HR=2.14; 95% CI, 1.11-4.10 for DFS).
conclusionsc-MYC gain (but not chromosome 8 gain or c-MYC amplification) was an independent poor-prognostic factor for DFS and OS in lung adenocarcinomas, both in full cohort and stage I cancer, and possibly for DFS in EGFR-mutant adenocarcinomas. Additional studies are required to determine if patients with lung adenocarcinoma with c-MYC gain are candidates for additional first-line treatment to mitigate their increased risk for disease progression and death.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.