From subjects to experts--on the current transition of patient participation in research.

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

1. A patient perspective on applying intermittent fasting in gynecologic cancer.BMC research notes · 2023
   Trial
2. Supporting families and caregivers of children with disabilities through a parent peer mentor (PPM): experiences from a patient-oriented research network.Research involvement and engagement · 2023
   Article
3. Patient and researcher experiences of patient engagement in primary care health care research: A participatory qualitative study.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2022
   Article
4. Pragmatism as a paradigm for patient-oriented research.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2022
   Review
5. The practice of active patient involvement in rare disease research using ICT: experiences and lessons from the RUDY JAPAN project.Research involvement and engagement · 2021
   Article
6. Patient engagement in Canada: a scoping review of the 'how' and 'what' of patient engagement in health research.Health research policy and systems · 2018
   Article
7. Patient involvement in research priorities (PIRE): a study protocol.BMJ open · 2016
   Article

Corrections and comments

• Comment on
  Patient and citizen participation in health: the need for improved ethical support.2014

Authors and funding

1 author.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as