ArticleThe American journal of bioethics : AJOB2014
PPI: understanding the difference between patient and public involvement.
Article in The American journal of bioethics : AJOB, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Compression stockings in addition to low-molecular-weight heparin to prevent venous thromboembolism in surgical inpatients requiring pharmacoprophylaxis: the GAPS non-inferiority RCT.Health technology assessment (Winchester, England) · 2020Trial
- Ethical considerations for engaging frail and seriously ill patients as partners in research: sub-analysis of a systematic review.Research involvement and engagement · 2021Review
- Engaging Patients and Other Non-Researchers in Health Research: Defining Research Engagement.Journal of general internal medicine · 2020Article
- Patient and public involvement: Two sides of the same coin or different coins altogether?Bioethics · 2019Article
- Taking patient involvement seriously: a critical ethical analysis of participatory approaches in data-intensive medical research.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2019Article
- Involvement that makes an impact on healthcare: Perceptions of the Swedish public.Scandinavian journal of public health · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
- Comment on
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Indexed as
Identifiers
24809603What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.