ArticleAnnals of surgical oncology2014
Cost of contralateral prophylactic mastectomy.
Article in Annals of surgical oncology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed.
- Association Between Decision Regret and Psychosocial Outcomes Following Surgery Among Women with Unilateral Nonhereditary Breast Cancer.Annals of surgical oncology · 2026Article
- Patient Out-of-Pocket Costs and Healthcare Utilization Related to Mastectomy vs Breast Conservation: A Claims-Based Study.Journal of surgical oncology · 2026Article
- Complications of Prosthetic Breast Reconstruction in Prophylactic Versus Therapeutic Mastectomy: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open · 2025Article
- Longitudinal Study of Psychosocial Outcomes Following Surgery in Women with Unilateral Nonhereditary Breast Cancer.Annals of surgical oncology · 2021Article
- Contralateral prophylactic mastectomy and implications for breast reconstruction.Gland surgery · 2021Review
- Article
- Cost effectiveness of bilateral risk-reducing mastectomy and salpingo-oophorectomy.European journal of medical research · 2019Article
- The use of contralateral prophylactic mastectomy among elderly patients in the United States.Breast cancer research and treatment · 2019Article
- Social Network, Surgeon, and Media Influence on the Decision to Undergo Contralateral Prophylactic Mastectomy.American journal of clinical oncology · 2018Article
- The Cost of Contralateral Prophylactic Mastectomy in Women with Unilateral Breast Cancer.Plastic and reconstructive surgery · 2018Article
- Cost and Complications of Local Therapies for Early-Stage Breast Cancer.Journal of the National Cancer Institute · 2017Article
- Better contralateral breast cancer risk estimation and alternative options to contralateral prophylactic mastectomy.International journal of women's health · 2015Review
- Contralateral risk-reducing mastectomy: review of risk factors and risk-reducing strategies.International journal of surgical oncology · 2015Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeTo compare the healthcare costs of women with unilateral breast cancer who underwent contralateral prophylactic mastectomy (CPM) with those of women who did not.
methodsWe conducted a retrospective study of 904 women treated for stage I-III breast cancer with or without CPM. Women were matched according to age, year at diagnosis, stage, and receipt of chemotherapy. We included healthcare costs starting from the date of surgery to 24 months. We identified whether care was immediate or delayed (CPM within 6 months or 6-24 months after initial surgery, respectively). Costs were converted to approximate Medicare reimbursement values and adjusted for inflation. Multivariable regression analysis was performed to evaluate the effect of CPM on total breast cancer care costs adjusting for patient characteristics and accounting for matched pairs.
resultsThe mean difference between the CPM and no-CPM matched groups was $3,573 (standard error [SE] $455) for professional costs, $4,176 (SE $1,724) for technical costs, and $7,749 (SE $2,069) for total costs. For immediate and delayed CPM, the mean difference for total costs was $6,528 (SE $2,243) and $16,744 (SE $5,017), respectively. In multivariable analysis, the CPM group had a statistically significant increase of 16.9 % in mean total costs compared with the no-CPM group (p < 0.0001). Human epidermal growth factor receptor 2/neu-positive status, receipt of radiation, and reconstruction were associated with increases in total costs.
conclusionsCPM significantly increases short-term healthcare costs for women with unilateral breast cancer. These patient-level cost results can be used for future studies that evaluate the influence of costs of CPM on decision making.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.