ArticleFrontiers in genetics2014
categoryCompare, an analytical tool based on feature annotations.
Article in Frontiers in genetics, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
28 citing papers in PubMed.
- High-Quality Predicted Metabolite-Pathway Annotations Expand Pathway Coverage and Increase Enriched Pathway Detection Across Metabolomics Datasets.Metabolites · 2026Article
- Integrated multi-omic analyses reveal novel gene-metabolite relationships in human steatohepatitic hepatocellular carcinoma.Journal of lipid research · 2026Article
- FASN Inhibition Enhances the Efficacy of Chemotherapy in Colorectal Cancer by Inhibiting the DNA Damage Response.Cancer research · 2026Article
- Information-Content-Informed Kendall-Tau Correlation Methodology: Interpreting Missing Values in Metabolomics as Potentially Useful Information.Metabolites · 2026Article
- High-Quality Predicted Pathway Annotations Greatly Improve Pathway Enrichment Analysis of Metabolomics Datasets.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
- Polycomb deficiency drives a FOXP2-high aggressive state targetable by epigenetic inhibitors.Nature communications · 2023Article
- Shoc2 controls ERK1/2-driven neural crest development by balancing components of the extracellular matrix.Developmental biology · 2022Article
- Deletion of pancreas-specific miR-216a reduces beta-cell mass and inhibits pancreatic cancer progression in mice.Cell reports. Medicine · 2021Article
- Untargeted Lipidomics of Non-Small Cell Lung Carcinoma Demonstrates Differentially Abundant Lipid Classes in Cancer vs. Non-Cancer Tissue.Metabolites · 2021Article
- Differential gene expression analysis of palbociclib-resistant TNBC via RNA-seq.Breast cancer research and treatment · 2021Article
- Loss of CLN3, the gene mutated in juvenile neuronal ceroid lipofuscinosis, leads to metabolic impairment and autophagy induction in retinal pigment epithelium.Biochimica et biophysica acta. Molecular basis of disease · 2020Article
- Article
- Comparative gene expression analysis in melanocytes driven by tumor cell-derived exosomes.Experimental cell research · 2020Article
- Dataset for dose and time-dependent transcriptional response to ionizing radiation exposure.Data in brief · 2019Article
- HNRNPA2/B1 is upregulated in endocrine-resistant LCC9 breast cancer cells and alters the miRNA transcriptome when overexpressed in MCF-7 cells.Scientific reports · 2019Article
- Coupling of PARP1-mediated chromatin structural changes to transcriptional RNA polymerase II elongation and cotranscriptional splicing.Epigenetics & chromatin · 2019Article
- Advances in gene ontology utilization improve statistical power of annotation enrichment.PloS one · 2019Article
- Detection of Differentially Expressed Cleavage Site Intervals Within 3' Untranslated Regions Using CSI-UTR Reveals Regulated Interaction Motifs.Frontiers in genetics · 2019Article
- Transcriptomic response of breast cancer cells to anacardic acid.Scientific reports · 2018Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Assessment of high-throughput-omics data initially focuses on relative or raw levels of a particular feature, such as an expression value for a transcript, protein, or metabolite. At a second level, analyses of annotations including known or predicted functions and associations of each individual feature, attempt to distill biological context. Most currently available comparative- and meta-analyses methods are dependent on the availability of identical features across data sets, and concentrate on determining features that are differentially expressed across experiments, some of which may be considered "biomarkers." The heterogeneity of measurement platforms and inherent variability of biological systems confounds the search for robust biomarkers indicative of a particular condition. In many instances, however, multiple data sets show involvement of common biological processes or signaling pathways, even though individual features are not commonly measured or differentially expressed between them. We developed a methodology, categoryCompare, for cross-platform and cross-sample comparison of high-throughput data at the annotation level. We assessed the utility of the approach using hypothetical data, as well as determining similarities and differences in the set of processes in two instances: (1) denervated skin vs. denervated muscle, and (2) colon from Crohn's disease vs. colon from ulcerative colitis (UC). The hypothetical data showed that in many cases comparing annotations gave superior results to comparing only at the gene level. Improved analytical results depended as well on the number of genes included in the annotation term, the amount of noise in relation to the number of genes expressing in unenriched annotation categories, and the specific method in which samples are combined. In the skin vs. muscle denervation comparison, the tissues demonstrated markedly different responses. The Crohn's vs. UC comparison showed gross similarities in inflammatory response in the two diseases, with particular processes specific to each disease.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.