Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24808893›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in microbiology2014

Clostridium difficile phages: still difficult?

Katherine R Hargreaves, Martha R J Clokie

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in microbiology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 75 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
75citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
5.8field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

75 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 124 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Re-evaluating what makes a phage unsuitable for therapy.npj antimicrobials and resistance · 2025
    Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Bacteriophage therapy for controlling poultry production problems.Iranian journal of veterinary research · 2025
    Review
  12. Directed evolution of bacteriophages: thwarted by prolific prophage.Applied and environmental microbiology · 2024
    Article
  13. Directed evolution of bacteriophages: impacts of prolific prophage.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024
    Article
  14. Isolation and Characterization of Six NovelPHAGE (New Rochelle, N.Y.) · 2024
    Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Anaerobiosis, a neglected factor in phage-bacteria interactions.Applied and environmental microbiology · 2023
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Review

15 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Katherine R HargreavesDepartment of Infection, Immunity and Inflammation, University of Leicester Leicester, UK.
Martha R J ClokieDepartment of Infection, Immunity and Inflammation, University of Leicester Leicester, UK.
University of Leicester · GB

Funding

Medical Research Council G0700855
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Phages that infect Clostridium difficile were first isolated for typing purposes in the 1980s, but their use was short lived. However, the rise of C. difficile epidemics over the last decade has triggered a resurgence of interest in using phages to combat this pathogen. Phage therapy is an attractive treatment option for C. difficile infection, however, developing suitable phages is challenging. In this review we summarize the difficulties faced by researchers in this field, and we discuss the solutions and strategies used for the development of C. difficile phages for use as novel therapeutics. Epidemiological data has highlighted the diversity and distribution of C. difficile, and shown that novel strains continue to emerge in clinical settings. In parallel with epidemiological studies, advances in molecular biology have bolstered our understanding of C. difficile biology, and our knowledge of phage-host interactions in other bacterial species. These three fields of biology have therefore paved the way for future work on C. difficile phages to progress and develop. Benefits of using C. difficile phages as therapeutic agents include the fact that they have highly specific interactions with their bacterial hosts. Studies also show that they can reduce bacterial numbers in both in vitro and in vivo systems. Genetic analysis has revealed the genomic diversity among these phages and provided an insight into their taxonomy and evolution. No strictly virulent C. difficile phages have been reported and this contributes to the difficulties with their therapeutic exploitation. Although treatment approaches using the phage-encoded endolysin protein have been explored, the benefits of using "whole-phages" are such that they remain a major research focus. Whilst we don't envisage working with C. difficile phages will be problem-free, sufficient study should inform future strategies to facilitate their development to combat this problematic pathogen.

Indexed as

Clostridium difficilegenomicsgut pathogenlysogenynosocomialphage evolutionphage therapy

Identifiers

PMID24808893
PMCPMC4009436
OpenAlexW2012427120

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.