ReviewCurrent opinion in rheumatology2014
Inhibitors of sclerostin: emerging concepts.
Review in Current opinion in rheumatology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Serum sclerostin and adverse outcomes in elderly patients with stable coronary artery disease undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention.Aging clinical and experimental research · 2020Article
- Update on the impact of type 2 diabetes mellitus on bone metabolism and material properties.Endocrine connections · 2019Review
- Article
- Assessment of the effect of systemic delivery of sclerostin antibodies on Wnt signaling in distraction osteogenesis.Journal of bone and mineral metabolism · 2018Article
- SOST, an LNGFR target, inhibits the osteogenic differentiation of rat ectomesenchymal stem cells.Cell proliferation · 2018Article
- Osteocytic signalling pathways as therapeutic targets for bone fragility.Nature reviews. Endocrinology · 2016Review
- WNT1-induced Secreted Protein-1 (WISP1), a Novel Regulator of Bone Turnover and Wnt Signaling.The Journal of biological chemistry · 2015Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purpose of reviewRecent data suggest that inhibitors of sclerostin, an osteocyte-produced Wnt signaling pathway antagonist, can stimulate bone formation. This review provides rationale and summarizes recent evidence supporting this novel approach to skeletal anabolism. RECENT
findingsData from numerous preclinical models in rodents and monkeys consistently demonstrate that antisclerostin monoclonal antibody (Scl-Ab) treatment leads to improvements in bone mass and strength, as well as enhanced fracture repair. Delivery of Scl-Ab therapy either subcutaneously or intravenously in phase 1 and 2 human clinical trials demonstrates short-term anabolic responses in excess of those seen with teriparatide, the only currently available anabolic skeletal agent. Gains have been primarily at central (spine and hips) versus peripheral (wrist) sites. Strikingly, Scl-Ab treatment appears to both stimulate bone formation and inhibit bone resorption in humans. If proven, Scl-Ab would be the first pharmacologic agent with such dual properties. Data on fractures are not yet available. SUMMARY: Scl-Ab therapy represents a novel pharmacologic approach to skeletal anabolism. Although many questions remain before Scl-Ab treatment can be introduced into clinical practice, phase 3 human clinical trials are currently underway and could provide the necessary data to bring this exciting class of skeletal anabolic agents to patient care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.