ArticleObstetrics and gynecology2014
Lifetime risk of stress urinary incontinence or pelvic organ prolapse surgery.
Article in Obstetrics and gynecology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 8 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 442 papers, 14 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Host Response to Pessaries in Microbial Communities of the Postmenopausal
Potential Biomarkers in the Study of Overactive Bladder in Women
Prospective, Multicenter, 60 Months, Single Arm Cohort Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of the Ultra-Light-Weight Mesh CAlistar S in Transvaginal Pelvic Organ Prolapse Repair
Minimally Invasive Burch Colposuspension to Reduce Occult Stress Incontinence
Pelvic Floor Disorder Education in the Prenatal Period, a Randomized Controlled Trial
Is Absorbable Suture Non-Inferior to Permanent Suture in Sacrospinous Ligament Suspension? A Randomized Controlled Trial
Comparing Retroperitoneal Tunneling Versus Dissection Technique During Robotic Assisted Sacrocolpopexy for Pelvic Organ Prolapse
Effect of Local Estriol Treatment Before Vaginal Repair Surgery on Vaginal Tissues and Early Postoperative Pelvic Floor Functions
Who cites it
442 citing papers in PubMed, 14 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Lateral suspension vs. sacral colpopexy for treating pelvic organ prolapse: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Archives of gynecology and obstetrics · 2025Pooled it
- Effect of pelvic floor muscle training on pelvic floor muscle morphometry in subjects with pelvic organ prolapse: a systematic review and meta-analysis.BMC women's health · 2025Pooled it
- Outcomes of Transvaginal Natural Orifice Transluminal Endoscopic Surgery (vNOTES) for Uterosacral Ligament Suspension in Apical Compartment Prolapse: A Systematic Review.International urogynecology journal · 2025Pooled it
- Perioperative interventions in pelvic organ prolapse surgery.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2025Pooled it
- Treatment outcomes of Manchester procedure versus vaginal hysterectomy for mid-compartment prolapse: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Acta obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica · 2025Pooled it
- Impact of childbirth on pelvic floor dysfunction in women who have undergone previous pelvic floor reconstructive surgery: systematic review and meta-analysis.International urogynecology journal · 2024Pooled it
- The Effect of Growth Factors on Vaginal Wound Healing: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.Tissue engineering. Part B, Reviews · 2023Pooled it
- Methods of postoperative void trial management after urogynecologic surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Systematic reviews · 2023Pooled it
- Lifestyle factors, metabolic factors and socioeconomic status for pelvic organ prolapse: a Mendelian randomization study.European journal of medical research · 2023Pooled it
- A systematic review of the surgical management of apical pelvic organ prolapse.International urogynecology journal · 2023Pooled it
- Mouse Knockout Models for Pelvic Organ Prolapse: a Systematic Review.International urogynecology journal · 2022Pooled it
- Is levator ani avulsion a risk factor for prolapse recurrence? A systematic review and meta-analysis.International urogynecology journal · 2022Pooled it
- The effect of pelvic floor muscle training for women with pelvic organ prolapse: a meta-analysis.International urogynecology journal · 2022Pooled it
- Does electroacupuncture benefit mixed urinary incontinence? A systematic review and meta-analysis with trial sequential analysis.International urogynecology journal · 2022Pooled it
- Outcomes by frailty and mobility in older patients undergoing major urogynecologic surgery: a planned supplementary study of the apical suspension repair for vault prolapse in a three-arm randomized (ASPIRe) trial.American journal of obstetrics and gynecology · 2026Trial
- Vaginal packing after laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy and surgical outcome after one year: A randomized controlled trial.Acta obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica · 2025Trial
- Comparing Post-Operative Pain Outcomes in Pelvic Organ Prolapse Surgery With and Without a Hysterectomy.International urogynecology journal · 2025Trial
- Silicone Irregular Hexagon Pessary Versus Polyvinyl Chloride Ring Pessary for Pelvic Organ Prolapse: Randomised Controlled Trial.International urogynecology journal · 2025Trial
- Trial
- Five-year surgical outcomes of transvaginal apical approaches in women with advanced pelvic organ prolapse.International urogynecology journal · 2023Trial
382 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveTo estimate the lifetime risk of stress urinary incontinence (SUI) surgery, pelvic organ prolapse (POP) surgery, or both using current, population-based surgical rates from 2007 to 2011.
methodsWe used a 2007-2011 U.S. claims and encounters database. We included women aged 18-89 years and estimated age-specific incidence rates and cumulative incidence (lifetime risk) of SUI surgery, POP surgery, and either incontinence or prolapse surgery with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). We estimated lifetime risk until the age of 80 years to be consistent with prior studies.
resultsFrom 2007 to 2011, we evaluated 10,177,480 adult women who were followed for 24,979,447 person-years. Among these women, we identified 65,397 incident, or first, SUI and 57,755 incident prolapse surgeries. Overall, we found that the lifetime risk of any primary surgery for SUI or POP was 20.0% (95% CI 19.9-20.2) by the age of 80 years. Separately, the cumulative risk for SUI surgery was 13.6% (95% CI 13.5-13.7) and that for POP surgery was 12.6% (95% CI 12.4-2.7). For age-specific annual risk, SUI demonstrated a bimodal peak at age 46 years and then again at age 70-71 years with annual risks of 3.8 and 3.9 per 1,000 women, respectively. For POP, the risk increased progressively until ages 71 and 73 years when the annual risk was 4.3 per 1,000 women.
conclusionBased on a U.S. claims and encounters database, the estimated lifetime risk of surgery for either SUI or POP in women is 20.0% by the age of 80 years. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.