Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24807157›Full record

ArticleJournal of thoracic oncology : official publication of the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer2014

Supplementary prognostic variables for pleural mesothelioma: a report from the IASLC staging committee.

Harvey I Pass, Dorothy Giroux, Catherine Kennedy, Enrico Ruffini, Ayten K Cangir, David Rice, Hisao Asamura, David Waller, John Edwards, Walter Weder and 4 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of thoracic oncology : official publication of the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Treatment of Malignant Pleural Mesothelioma: American Society of Clinical Oncology Clinical Practice Guideline.Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology · 2018
    Guideline
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. The International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer Pleural Mesothelioma Staging Project: Updated Modeling of Prognostic Factors in Pleural Mesothelioma.Journal of thoracic oncology : official publication of the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer · 2023
    Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Observational
  15. Malignant pleural mesothelioma: an update.Jornal brasileiro de pneumologia : publicacao oficial da Sociedade Brasileira de Pneumologia e Tisilogia · 2021
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Extended pleurectomy decortication: the current role.Translational lung cancer research · 2018
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Harvey I Pass*Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, NYU Langone Medical Center, New York, New York; †Statistics Department, Cancer Research and Biostatistics, Seattle, Washington; ‡Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, University of Sydney, Strathfield Private Hospital Campus, Sydney, Australia; §Department of Thoracic Surgery, University of Torino, Ospedale San Giovanni Battista, Torino, Italy; ‖Department of Thoracic Surgery, Ankara University Faculty of Medicine, Ankara, Turkey; ¶Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas; #Thoracic Surgery, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan; **Department of Thoracic Surgery, Glenfield Hospital, Leicester, United Kingdom; ††Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Northern General Hospital, Sheffield, United Kingdom; ‡‡Thoracic Surgery, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland; §§Department of Thoracic Surgery, Thoraxklinik, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany; ‖‖Thoracic Oncology, University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium; and ¶¶Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.
Dorothy Giroux
Catherine Kennedy
Enrico Ruffini
Ayten K Cangir
David Rice
Hisao Asamura
David Waller
John Edwards
Walter Weder
Hans Hoffmann
Jan P van Meerbeeck
Valerie W Rusch
IASLC Staging Committee and Participating Institutions

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThe staging system for malignant pleural mesothelioma is controversial. To revise this system, the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer Staging Committee developed an international database. This report analyzes prognostic variables in a surgical population, which are supplementary to previously published CORE variables (stage, histology, sex, age, and type of procedure).

methodsSupplementary prognostic variables were studied in three scenarios: (1) all data available, that is, patient pathologically staged and other CORE variables available (2) only clinical staging available along with CORE variables, and (3) only age, sex, histology, and laboratory parameters are known. Survival was analyzed by Kaplan-Meier, prognostic factors by log rank and stepwise Cox regression modeling after elimination of nonsignificant variables. p value less than 0.05 was significant.

resultsA total of 2141 patients with best tumor, node, metastasis (TNM) stages (pathologic with/without clinical staging) had nonmissing age, sex, histology, and type of surgical procedure. Three prognostic models were defined. Scenario A (all parameters): best pathologic stage, histology, sex, age, type of surgery, adjuvant treatment, white blood cell count (WBC) (≥15.5 or not), and platelets (≥400 k or not) (n = 550). Scenario B (no surgical staging): clinical stage, histology, sex, age, type of surgery, adjuvant treatment, WBC, hemoglobin (<14.6 or not), and platelets (n = 627). Scenario C (limited data): histology, sex, age, WBC, hemoglobin, and platelets (n = 906).

conclusionRefinement of these models could define not only the appropriate patient preoperatively for best outcomes after cytoreductive surgery but also stratify surgically treated patients after clinical and pathologic staging who do or do not receive adjuvant therapy.

Indexed as

Neoplasm StagingAgedAge FactorsChemotherapy, AdjuvantFemaleHemoglobinsHumansKaplan-Meier EstimateLeukocyte CountMaleMesotheliomaMiddle AgedPlatelet CountPleural NeoplasmsPrognosisProportional Hazards ModelsHemoglobins

Identifiers

PMID24807157
PMCPMC4132031

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.