ArticleSleep & breathing = Schlaf & Atmung2015
Real-time prediction of disordered breathing events in people with obstructive sleep apnea.
Article in Sleep & breathing = Schlaf & Atmung, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- A prediction model based on artificial neural networks for the diagnosis of obstructive sleep apnea.Sleep & breathing = Schlaf & Atmung · 2016Trial
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
purposeConventional therapies for obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) are effective but suffer from poor patient adherence and may not fully alleviate major OSA-associated cardiovascular risk factors or improve certain aspects of quality of life. Predicting the onset of disordered breathing events in OSA patients may lead to improved strategies for treating OSA and inform our understanding of underlying disease mechanisms. In this work, we describe a deployable system capable of performing real-time predictions of sleep disordered breathing events in patients diagnosed with OSA, providing a novel approach for gaining insight into OSA pathophysiology, discovering population subgroups, and improving therapies.
methodsLArge Memory STorage and Retrieval artificial neural networks with 864 different configurations were applied to polysomnogram records from 64 patients. Wavelet transforms, measures of entropy, and other statistics were applied to six physiological signals to provide network inputs. Approximate statistical tests were used to determine the best performing network for each patient. The most important predictors of disordered breathing events in OSA patients were determined by analyzing internal network parameters.
resultsThe average optimized individual prediction sensitivity and specificity were 0.81 and 0.77, respectively. Predictions were better than random guessing for all OSA patients. Analysis of internal network parameters revealed a high degree of heterogeneity among disordered breathing event predictors and may reveal patient subgroups.
conclusionsWe report the first practical system to predict individual disordered breathing events in a heterogeneous group of patients diagnosed with OSA. The pattern of disordered breathing predictors suggests variable underlying pathophysiological mechanisms and highlights the need for an individualized approach to OSA diagnosis, therapy, and management.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.