Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24807059›Full record

ArticlePloS one2014

Efficacy and dose-dependent safety of intra-arterial delivery of mesenchymal stem cells in a rodent stroke model.

Dileep R Yavagal, Baowan Lin, Ami P Raval, Philip S Garza, Chuanhui Dong, Weizhao Zhao, Erika B Rangel, Ian McNiece, Tatjana Rundek, Ralph L Sacco and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 65 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
65citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
5.3field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

65 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 107 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. OPTRACE: Optical Imaging-Guided Transplantation and Tracking of Cells in the Mouse Brain.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026
    Article
  10. "Time Is Brain" - for Cell Therapies.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026
    Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review

5 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Dileep R YavagalCerebral Vascular Disease Research Laboratories, Leonard M. Miller School of Medicine, University of Miami, Miami, Florida, United States of America; Department of Neurology, Leonard M. Miller School of Medicine, University of Miami, Miami, Florida, United States of America; Interdisciplinary Stem Cell Institute, Leonard M. Miller School of Medicine, University of Miami, Miami, Florida, United States of America.
Baowan LinCerebral Vascular Disease Research Laboratories, Leonard M. Miller School of Medicine, University of Miami, Miami, Florida, United States of America.
Ami P RavalCerebral Vascular Disease Research Laboratories, Leonard M. Miller School of Medicine, University of Miami, Miami, Florida, United States of America; Department of Neurology, Leonard M. Miller School of Medicine, University of Miami, Miami, Florida, United States of America.
Philip S GarzaCerebral Vascular Disease Research Laboratories, Leonard M. Miller School of Medicine, University of Miami, Miami, Florida, United States of America.
Chuanhui DongDepartment of Neurology, Leonard M. Miller School of Medicine, University of Miami, Miami, Florida, United States of America.
Weizhao ZhaoDepartment of Neurology, Leonard M. Miller School of Medicine, University of Miami, Miami, Florida, United States of America.
Erika B RangelInterdisciplinary Stem Cell Institute, Leonard M. Miller School of Medicine, University of Miami, Miami, Florida, United States of America.
Ian McNieceInterdisciplinary Stem Cell Institute, Leonard M. Miller School of Medicine, University of Miami, Miami, Florida, United States of America.
Tatjana RundekDepartment of Neurology, Leonard M. Miller School of Medicine, University of Miami, Miami, Florida, United States of America.
Ralph L SaccoDepartment of Neurology, Leonard M. Miller School of Medicine, University of Miami, Miami, Florida, United States of America.
Miguel Perez-PinzonCerebral Vascular Disease Research Laboratories, Leonard M. Miller School of Medicine, University of Miami, Miami, Florida, United States of America; Department of Neurology, Leonard M. Miller School of Medicine, University of Miami, Miami, Florida, United States of America.
Joshua M HareInterdisciplinary Stem Cell Institute, Leonard M. Miller School of Medicine, University of Miami, Miami, Florida, United States of America; The Department of Medicine, Leonard M. Miller School of Medicine, University of Miami, Miami, Florida, United States of America.
University of Miami · US

Funding

Miami Clinical and Translational Science InstituteUL1TR000460 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF MIAMI SCHOOL OF MEDICINE · PI SACCO, RALPH L. · 2012 to 2016
$16.9M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR000460
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Intra-arterial (IA) delivery of mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) for acute ischemic stroke is attractive for clinical translation. However, studies using rat model of stroke have demonstrated that IA MSCs delivery can decrease middle cerebral artery (MCA) flow, which may limit its clinical translation. The goal of this study is to identify a dose of IA MSCs (maximum tolerated dose; MTD) that does not compromise MCA flow and evaluate its efficacy and optimal timing in a rat model of reversible middle cerebral artery occlusion (rMCAo). We sought to determine if there is a difference in efficacy of acute (1 h) versus sub-acute (24 h) IA MSCs treatment after rMCAo. Adult female Sprague-Dawley rats underwent rMCAo (90 min) and an hour later a single dose of MSCs (at de-escalating doses 1 × 10(6), 5 × 10(5), 2 × 10(5), 1 × 10(5) and 5 × 10(4)) was given using IA route. MSCs were suspended in phosphate buffered saline (PBS) and PBS alone was used for control experiments. We measured the percent change in mean laser Doppler flow signal over the ipsilateral MCA in de-escalating doses groups to determine MTD. The results demonstrated that the lowering of IA MSC dose to 1 × 10(5) and below did not compromise MCA flow and hence an IA MSC dose of 1 × 10(5) considered as MTD. Subsequently, 1 h and 24 h after rMCAo, rats were treated with IA MSCs or PBS. The 24 h delivery of IA MSCs significantly improved neurodeficit score and reduced the mean infarct volume at one month as compared to control, but not the 1 h delivery. Overall, this study suggests that the IA delivery of MSCs can be performed safely and efficaciously at the MTD of 1 × 10(5) delivered at 24 hours in rodent model of stroke.

Indexed as

AnimalsDisease Models, AnimalFemaleInfarction, Middle Cerebral ArteryInfusions, Intra-ArterialMesenchymal Stem Cell TransplantationRatsRats, Sprague-DawleyStroke

Identifiers

PMID24807059
PMCPMC4012944
OpenAlexW2105083983

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.