Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24806569›Full record

ArticleJournal of occupational and environmental medicine2014

Estimating the return on investment from a health risk management program offered to small Colorado-based employers.

Ron Z Goetzel, Maryam Tabrizi, Rachel Mosher Henke, Richele Benevent, Claire V S Brockbank, Kaylan Stinson, Margo Trotter, Lee S Newman

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of occupational and environmental medicine, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 6 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Return on investment of public health interventions: a systematic review.Journal of epidemiology and community health · 2017
    Pooled it
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. What Could Total Worker Health® Look Like in Small Enterprises?Annals of work exposures and health · 2018
    Article
  12. Observational
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Ron Z GoetzelFrom the Institute for Health and Productivity Studies (Dr Goetzel), Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University, Washington, DC; Truven Health Analytics (Drs Goetzel and Tabrizi), Bethesda, Md; Truven Health Analytics (Dr Henke), Cambridge, Mass; Truven Health Analytics (Ms Benevent), Santa Barbara, Calif; Segue Consulting (Ms Brockbank), Denver, Colo; Colorado School of Public Health (Ms Stinson and Dr Newman), Center for Worker Health and Environment, and Colorado School of Medicine (Dr Newman), University of Colorado, Aurora; and Trotter Wellness Ltd (Ms Trotter), Sheboygan, Wis.
Maryam Tabrizi
Rachel Mosher Henke
Richele Benevent
Claire V S Brockbank
Kaylan Stinson
Margo Trotter
Lee S Newman

Funding

OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HEALTH EDUCATION AND RESEARCH CENTERS (T42)T42OH009229 · OH · UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO DENVER · PI NEWMAN, LEE S · 2007 to 2024
$28.8M
NIOSH CDC HHS T42 OH009229
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo determine whether changes in health risks for workers in small businesses can produce medical and productivity cost savings.

methodsA 1-year pre- and posttest study tracked changes in 10 modifiable health risks for 2458 workers at 121 Colorado businesses that participated in a comprehensive worksite health promotion program. Risk reductions were entered into a return-on-investment (ROI) simulation model.

resultsReductions were recorded in 10 risk factors examined, including obesity (-2.0%), poor eating habits (-5.8%), poor physical activity (-6.5%), tobacco use (-1.3%), high alcohol consumption (-1.7%), high stress (-3.5%), depression (-2.3%), high blood pressure (-0.3%), high total cholesterol (-0.9%), and high blood glucose (-0.2%). The ROI model estimated medical and productivity savings of $2.03 for every $1.00 invested.

conclusionsPooled data suggest that small businesses can realize a positive ROI from effective risk reduction programs.

Indexed as

Cost-Benefit AnalysisOccupational HealthRisk Reduction BehaviorAdultColoradoFemaleHealth PromotionHumansMaleMiddle AgedProspective StudiesRisk Factors

Identifiers

PMID24806569
PMCPMC4469337

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.