ReviewInternational journal of molecular sciences2014
Biomarkers in Alzheimer's disease analysis by mass spectrometry-based proteomics.
Review in International journal of molecular sciences, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Pooled it
- Des-Arg(9) bradykinin as a causal metabolite for autism spectrum disorder.World journal of psychiatry · 2024Article
- Current Progress and Future Directions for Tau-Based Fluid Biomarker Diagnostics in Alzheimer's Disease.International journal of molecular sciences · 2020Review
- Urinary metabolites identified using metabolomic analysis as potential biomarkers of nocturia in elderly men.World journal of urology · 2020Observational
- The PERK-Dependent Molecular Mechanisms as a Novel Therapeutic Target for Neurodegenerative Diseases.International journal of molecular sciences · 2020Review
- Diagnostic and prognostic value of microRNAs for Alzheimer's disease: a comprehensive meta-analysis.Medicine and pharmacy reports · 2020Article
- Liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry identification of serum biomarkers for nocturia in aged men.World journal of urology · 2019Article
- The Challenge to Search for New Nervous System Disease Biomarker Candidates: the Opportunity to Use the Proteogenomics Approach.Journal of molecular neuroscience : MN · 2019Review
- Current progress, challenges and future prospects of diagnostic and therapeutic interventions in Alzheimer's disease.RSC advances · 2018Review
- CSF-PR 2.0: An Interactive Literature Guide to Quantitative Cerebrospinal Fluid Mass Spectrometry Data from Neurodegenerative Disorders.Molecular & cellular proteomics : MCP · 2017Article
- Insight of brain degenerative protein modifications in the pathology of neurodegeneration and dementia by proteomic profiling.Molecular brain · 2016Review
- In-depth mapping of the mouse brain N-glycoproteome reveals widespread N-glycosylation of diverse brain proteins.Oncotarget · 2016Article
- Neurodegeneration and Alzheimer's disease (AD). What Can Proteomics Tell Us About the Alzheimer's Brain?Molecular & cellular proteomics : MCP · 2016Review
- Proteomic profile of seminal plasma in adolescents and adults with treated and untreated varicocele.Asian journal of andrologyReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Alzheimer's disease (AD) is a common chronic and destructive disease. The early diagnosis of AD is difficult, thus the need for clinically applicable biomarkers development is growing rapidly. There are many methods to biomarker discovery and identification. In this review, we aim to summarize Mass spectrometry (MS)-based proteomics studies on AD and discuss thoroughly the methods to identify candidate biomarkers in cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) and blood. This review will also discuss the potential research areas on biomarkers.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.