Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24806032›Full record

ArticleCPT: pharmacometrics & systems pharmacology2014

A review of mixed-effects models of tumor growth and effects of anticancer drug treatment used in population analysis.

B Ribba, N H Holford, P Magni, I Trocóniz, I Gueorguieva, P Girard, C Sarr, M Elishmereni, C Kloft, L E Friberg

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in CPT: pharmacometrics & systems pharmacology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 100 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
100citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

100 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Systematic evaluation of pembrolizumab dosing in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer.Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology · 2016
    Trial
  12. Trial
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article

40 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

B RibbaINRIA, Project-Team NUMED, École Normale Supérieure de Lyon, Lyon, France.
N H HolfordDepartment of Pharmaceutical Biosciences, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.
P MagniDipartimento di Ingegneria Industriale e dell'Informazione, Università degli Studi di Pavia, Pavia, Italy.
I TrocónizDepartment of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Technology, School of Pharmacy, University of Navarra, Pamplona, Spain.
I GueorguievaGlobal PK/PD Department, Lilly Research Laboratories, Surrey, UK.
P GirardMerck Institute for Pharmacometrics, EPFL, Lausanne, Switzerland.
C SarrAdvanced Quantitative Sciences Department, Novartis Pharma AG, Basel, Switzerland.
M ElishmereniOptimata Ltd., Bene Ataroth, Israel.
C KloftDepartment of Clinical Pharmacy and Biochemistry, Institute of Pharmacy, Freie Universitaet Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
L E FribergDepartment of Pharmaceutical Biosciences, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Population modeling of tumor size dynamics has recently emerged as an important tool in pharmacometric research. A series of new mixed-effects models have been reported recently, and we present herein a synthetic view of models with published mathematical equations aimed at describing the dynamics of tumor size in cancer patients following anticancer drug treatment. This selection of models will constitute the basis for the Drug Disease Model Resources (DDMoRe) repository for models on oncology.

Identifiers

PMID24806032
PMCPMC4050233

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.