ArticleMycopathologia2014
Yeast oropharyngeal colonization in human immunodeficiency virus-infected patients in central taiwan.
Article in Mycopathologia, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Genetic variation and mutational determinants of azole resistance in Candida albicans strains of oropharyngeal colonization in HIV patients and bloodstream infections.Journal of biomedical science · 2026Article
- Oral colonization by Candida species in HIV-positive patients: association and antifungal susceptibility study.Einstein (Sao Paulo, Brazil) · 2018Article
- Oropharyngeal Candidosis in HIV-Infected Patients-An Update.Frontiers in microbiology · 2018Review
- Methods of Candida dubliniensis identification and its occurrence in human clinical material.Folia microbiologica · 2017Article
- Prevalence of and risk factors for methicillin-resistantJournal of oral microbiology · 2017Article
- Comparison of Switching and Biofilm Formation between MTL-Homozygous Strains of Candida albicans and Candida dubliniensis.Eukaryotic cell · 2015Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
A prospective, cross-sectional study was conducted at a medical center in central Taiwan to understand the prevalence, associated factors, and microbiologic features for oropharyngeal yeast colonization in human immunodeficiency virus-infected outpatients. Oral yeast colonization was detected in 127 (45 %) patients, including 21 (16.5 %) colonized by more than one species. Of the 154 isolates, Candida albicans was the most common species (114, 74 %), followed by Candida dubliniensis (10, 6.5 %), Candida glabrata (10, 6.5 %), Candida tropicalis (7, 4.5 %), and 13 others. We found that receiving antituberculous drug (p = 0.046) or atazanavir (p = 0.045) was two predictors for patients colonized by non-C. albicans species (p = 0.005) and risking mixed yeast colonization (p = 0.009). Even though our data showed that clinical antifungal drugs remained effective in vitro against the colonizing yeasts, the increased mixed yeast colonization indicates a potential issue for controlling mixed infections in hospital settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
24804977What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.