ReviewBioMed research international2014
Potential biomarkers and their applications for rapid and reliable detection of malaria.
Review in BioMed research international, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 48 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
48 citing papers in PubMed, 130 citations in OpenAlex.
- Performance of a sensitive haemozoin-based malaria diagnostic test validated for vivax malaria diagnosis in Brazilian Amazon.Malaria journal · 2021Trial
- Potential biomarkers and their recent applications ofr point-of-care biosensors for the diagnosis of malaria.Mikrochimica acta · 2026Review
- Malaria-induced dysregulation of selected micronutrients (Ca, Mg, Na, K, Zn, Fe, Co) and plasma free amino acids; implications for pathogenesis and host immunity in a Nigerian population.Parasite epidemiology and control · 2025Article
- Performance and usability evaluation of three LDH-based malaria rapid diagnostic tests in Kédougou, Senegal.Parasites & vectors · 2025Article
- Exploring Biomarkers for Malaria: Advances in Early Detection and Asymptomatic Diagnosis.Biosensors · 2025Review
- Article
- Performance and usability evaluation of three LDH-based malaria rapid diagnostic tests in Kédougou, Senegal.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2024Article
- Revolution in malaria detection: unveiling current breakthroughs and tomorrow's possibilities in biomarker innovation.Annals of medicine and surgery (2012) · 2024Review
- Liquid Redox Probe-Free Plastic Antibody Development for Malaria Biomarker Recognition.ACS omega · 2024Article
- Cloning, Expression, Purification, and Characterization of Lactate Dehydrogenase fromInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2024Article
- Host metabolomic responses in recurrent P. vivax malaria.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Paper-Based Microfluidic Chips for Food Hazard Factor Detection: Fabrication, Modification, and Application.Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
- Genetic diversity ofAfrican health sciences · 2023Article
- Aptamer-Based Technologies for Parasite Detection.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
- Lateral flow assays for viruses diagnosis: Up-to-date technology and future prospects.Trends in analytical chemistry : TRAC · 2022Review
- A microfluidic paper analytical device using capture aptamers for the detection of PfLDH in blood matrices.Malaria journal · 2022Article
- Review of Microdevices for Hemozoin-Based Malaria Detection.Biosensors · 2022Review
- Advances and challenges in automated malaria diagnosis using digital microscopy imaging with artificial intelligence tools: A review.Frontiers in microbiology · 2022Review
- Impact of Malaria Diagnostic Technologies on the Disease Burden in the Sub-Saharan Africa.Journal of tropical medicine · 2022Review
- Genetic variation of Plasmodium falciparum histidine-rich protein 2 and 3 in Assosa zone, Ethiopia: its impact on the performance of malaria rapid diagnostic tests.Malaria journal · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Malaria has been responsible for the highest mortality in most malaria endemic countries. Even after decades of malaria control campaigns, it still persists as a disease of high mortality due to improper diagnosis and rapidly evolving drug resistant malarial parasites. For efficient and economical malaria management, WHO recommends that all malaria suspected patients should receive proper diagnosis before administering drugs. It is thus imperative to develop fast, economical, and accurate techniques for diagnosis of malaria. In this regard an in-depth knowledge on malaria biomarkers is important to identify an appropriate biorecognition element and utilize it prudently to develop a reliable detection technique for diagnosis of the disease. Among the various biomarkers, plasmodial lactate dehydrogenase and histidine-rich protein II (HRP II) have received increasing attention for developing rapid and reliable detection techniques for malaria. The widely used rapid detection tests (RDTs) for malaria succumb to many drawbacks which promotes exploration of more efficient economical detection techniques. This paper provides an overview on the current status of malaria biomarkers, along with their potential utilization for developing different malaria diagnostic techniques and advanced biosensors.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.