Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24804168›Full record

ArticleBioResearch open access2014

Follow-up of implant survival comparing ficoll and bone marrow aspirate concentrate methods for hard tissue regeneration with mesenchymal stem cells in humans.

Fabian Duttenhoefer, Stefan F Hieber, Andres Stricker, Rainer Schmelzeisen, Ralf Gutwald, Sebastian Sauerbier

Registry-linked trialOpen access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BioResearch open access, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05465421 (Clinical and Radiographic Assessment of Buccolingual Bone Dimension Following Socket Preservation With Bone Marrow Mono-nuclear Cell From the Maxillary Tuberosity Combined With Platelet-rich Fibrin Compared With Platelet-rich Fibrin Alone), which is not on this map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05465421 naunknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2022, after this paper: background citation

Clinical and Radiographic Assessment of Buccolingual Bone Dimension Following Socket Preservation With Bone Marrow Mono-nuclear Cell From the Maxillary Tuberosity Combined With Platelet-rich Fibrin Compared With Platelet-rich Fibrin Alone

TypeinterventionalSponsorCairo UniversityRan2022 to 2023Enrolled24ConditionsDecayed TeethArmsbone marrow aspiration from maxillary tuberosity and BMMNCs separation to be seeded on PRF and used for socket preservation
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Autologous cell-based therapy for treatment of large bone defects: from bench to bedside.European journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society · 2018
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Fabian DuttenhoeferDepartment of Oral and Craniomaxillofacial Surgery, University Hospital Freiburg , Freiburg, Germany .
Stefan F HieberDepartment of Oral and Craniomaxillofacial Surgery, University Hospital Freiburg , Freiburg, Germany .
Andres StrickerDepartment of Oral and Craniomaxillofacial Surgery, University Hospital Freiburg , Freiburg, Germany .
Rainer SchmelzeisenDepartment of Oral and Craniomaxillofacial Surgery, University Hospital Freiburg , Freiburg, Germany .
Ralf GutwaldDepartment of Oral and Craniomaxillofacial Surgery, University Hospital Freiburg , Freiburg, Germany .
Sebastian SauerbierDepartment of Oral and Craniomaxillofacial Surgery, University Hospital Freiburg , Freiburg, Germany .
University Medical Center Freiburg · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveClinical follow-up of implant survival in 11 patients comparing two different methods for mesenchymal stem cell (MSC) isolation (Ficoll and bone marrow aspirate concentrate [BMAC]) applied in maxillary sinus augmentation.

methodsMononuclear cells, including MSCs, were concentrated with either Ficoll (control group, n=6 sinus) or BMAC (test group, n=12 sinus) and transplanted in combination with bovine bone mineral. A total of 50 implants were placed in a second surgical intervention (17 Ficoll/33 BMAC) and loaded after 4 months. Overall implant survival was assessed with a Kaplan-Meier model using package survival under R.

resultsImplant survival of the Ficoll group was 100% compared with the BMAC group, which had 93.4% survival (95% confidence interval, 0.849-1). The difference between the groups was not significant (p=0.381).

conclusionThe BMAC system is an effective and suitable "chair-side" method for clinical application in hard tissue regeneration.

Indexed as

biomaterialscell culturetissue engineering

Identifiers

PMID24804168
PMCPMC3995205
OpenAlexW2003051680

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.