Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24804085›Full record

ReviewJournal of obesity2014

Periconception weight loss: common sense for mothers, but what about for babies?

Kristine Matusiak, Helen L Barrett, Leonie K Callaway, Marloes Dekker Nitert

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of obesity, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
4.0field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Kristine MatusiakSchool of Medicine, The University of Queensland, 288 Herston Road, Herston, QLD 4006, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-0357-1661
Helen L BarrettSchool of Medicine, The University of Queensland, 288 Herston Road, Herston, QLD 4006, Australia ; The UQ Centre for Clinical Research, The University of Queensland, RBWH Campus, Butterfield Street, Herston, QLD 4029, Australia ; The Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital, Butterfield Street, Herston, QLD 4029, Australia.
Leonie K CallawaySchool of Medicine, The University of Queensland, 288 Herston Road, Herston, QLD 4006, Australia ; The Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital, Butterfield Street, Herston, QLD 4029, Australia.
Marloes Dekker NitertSchool of Medicine, The University of Queensland, 288 Herston Road, Herston, QLD 4006, Australia ; The UQ Centre for Clinical Research, The University of Queensland, RBWH Campus, Butterfield Street, Herston, QLD 4029, Australia.
The University of Queensland · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Obesity in the childbearing population is increasingly common. Obesity is associated with increased risk for a number of maternal and neonatal pregnancy complications. Some of these complications, such as gestational diabetes, are risk factors for long-term disease in both mother and baby. While clinical practice guidelines advocate for healthy weight prior to pregnancy, there is not a clear directive for achieving healthy weight before conception. There are known benefits to even moderate weight loss prior to pregnancy, but there are potential adverse effects of restricted nutrition during the periconceptional period. Epidemiological and animal studies point to differences in offspring conceived during a time of maternal nutritional restriction. These include changes in hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis function, body composition, glucose metabolism, and cardiovascular function. The periconceptional period is therefore believed to play an important role in programming offspring physiological function and is sensitive to nutritional insult. This review summarizes the evidence to date for offspring programming as a result of maternal periconception weight loss. Further research is needed in humans to clearly identify benefits and potential risks of losing weight in the months before conceiving. This may then inform us of clinical practice guidelines for optimal approaches to achieving a healthy weight before pregnancy.

Indexed as

FertilizationNutritional StatusObesityPregnancy ComplicationsPrenatal Exposure Delayed EffectsPrenatal Nutritional Physiological PhenomenaWeight LossAnimalsFemaleHumansMothersPregnancy

Identifiers

PMID24804085
PMCPMC3996361
OpenAlexW1969011609

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.