Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24803804›Full record

ReviewWorld journal of gastroenterology2014

Evolution of laparoscopy in colorectal surgery: an evidence-based review.

Alexander Emmanuel Blackmore, Mark Te Ching Wong, Choong Leong Tang

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in World journal of gastroenterology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Comparison of laparoscopic versus open gastrectomy for advanced gastric cancer: an updated meta-analysis.Gastric cancer : official journal of the International Gastric Cancer Association and the Japanese Gastric Cancer Association · 2016
    Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Robotic surgery in emergency general surgery: an overview of UK practice.World journal of emergency surgery : WJES · 2025
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Colorectal cancer: Recent advances in management and treatment.World journal of clinical oncology · 2024
    Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Laparoscopic Intracorporeal Anastomosis.Clinics in colon and rectal surgery · 2023
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. 2DWorld journal of gastrointestinal surgery · 2021
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Alexander Emmanuel BlackmoreAlexander Emmanuel Blackmore, Mark Te Ching Wong, Choong Leong Tang, Department of Colorectal Surgery, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore 169856, Singapore.
Mark Te Ching WongAlexander Emmanuel Blackmore, Mark Te Ching Wong, Choong Leong Tang, Department of Colorectal Surgery, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore 169856, Singapore.
Choong Leong TangAlexander Emmanuel Blackmore, Mark Te Ching Wong, Choong Leong Tang, Department of Colorectal Surgery, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore 169856, Singapore.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Open surgery for colorectal disease has progressed significantly over the past century from humble beginnings to form the mainstay of treatment for colorectal cancer and a number of benign conditions. Following the introduction of laparoscopic abdominal surgery, the next stage in the evolution of the specialty began in the 1990s with the first laparoscopic colonic resection. Following some early concerns regarding its safety and oncological efficacy during the latter part of that decade, laparoscopic colorectal surgery rapidly came into mainstream use in the early part of the current century with evidence supporting its use being made available from large scale randomised controlled trials. This article provides an evidence-based summary of this evolutionary process as it relates to both benign and malignant colorectal disease, as well as discussion of the next phase of new technologies such as robotic surgery.

Indexed as

Evidence-Based MedicineLaparoscopyColonDigestive System Surgical ProceduresEquipment DesignHumansRectumRisk FactorsRoboticsSurgery, Computer-AssistedTreatment OutcomeColorectal cancerColorectal surgeryLaparoscopic resection of gastrointestinalLaparoscopyPelvic floorRobotics

Identifiers

PMID24803804
PMCPMC4009524

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.