Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24803533›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of infectious diseases2014

Humanized staphylococcal enterotoxin B (SEB)-specific monoclonal antibodies protect from SEB intoxication and Staphylococcus aureus infections alone or as adjunctive therapy with vancomycin.

Avanish K Varshney, Xiaobo Wang, Jennifer MacIntyre, Richard S Zollner, Kerry Kelleher, Oleg V Kovalenko, Ximo Pechuan, Fergus R Byrne, Bettina C Fries

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of infectious diseases, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 36 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Monoclonal Antibodies Targeting Bacterial Infections: A Broad Review of the Field.BioDrugs : clinical immunotherapeutics, biopharmaceuticals and gene therapy · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Avanish K VarshneyDepartment of Medicine Department of Microbiology and Immunology.
Xiaobo WangDepartment of Medicine Department of Microbiology and Immunology.
Jennifer MacIntyrePfizer Centers for Therapeutic Innovation, New York, New York.
Richard S ZollnerPfizer Global BioTechnologies, Cambridge, Massachusetts.
Kerry KelleherPfizer Global BioTechnologies, Cambridge, Massachusetts.
Oleg V KovalenkoPfizer Global BioTechnologies, Cambridge, Massachusetts.
Ximo PechuanDepartment of Systems and Computational Biology, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx.
Fergus R ByrnePfizer Centers for Therapeutic Innovation, New York, New York.
Bettina C FriesDepartment of Medicine Department of Microbiology and Immunology.
Pfizer (United States) · USAlbert Einstein College of Medicine · USCenters for New Horizons · US

Funding

Viral Pathogenesis and TherapeuticsU54AI057158 · NIAID · WADSWORTH CENTER · PI LIPKIN, W. IAN · 2003 to 2014
$100.8M
NIAID NIH HHS U54 AI057158NIAID NIH HHS U54-AI057158
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundStaphylococcal enterotoxin B (SEB), a potential biological warfare agent, is a potent superantigen that contributes to the virulence of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA), which is a major health threat in the United States. Efforts to develop toxin-neutralizing antibodies as adjunctive therapies are justified, given the high mortality and frequent failure of therapy despite available antibiotics.

methodsMurine SEB-specific mAb 20B1 was humanized, and treatment benefits of Hu-1.6/1.1 and Hu-1.4/1.1 variants were investigated in mice in an SEB intoxication model, as well as in sepsis and deep-tissue infection models.

resultsHu-1.6/1.1 and Hu-1.4/1.1 protected mice against SEB-induced lethal shock. Hu-1.6/1.1 also enhanced survival of mice that developed fatal sepsis after challenge with a SEB-producing MRSA strain. Combined treatment of Hu-1.6/1.1 with vancomycin further increased survival and altered cytokine responses, compared with monotherapy with either monoclonal antibody or vancomycin alone. Efficacy was also demonstrated in the deep-tissue infection model, where Hu-1.4/1.1 bound to SEB in vivo and decreased abscess formation, as well as proinflammatory cytokine levels.

conclusionsSEB-neutralizing mAb 20B1 was successfully humanized. The mAb affects outcome by modulating the proinflammatory host response in both the sepsis and the intoxication models, which justifies further development.

Indexed as

Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureusAbscessAnimalsAnti-Bacterial AgentsAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedBinding Sites, AntibodyCytokinesEnterotoxinsMiceMice, Inbred BALB CStaphylococcal InfectionsVancomycinAnti-Bacterial AgentsAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedCytokinesenterotoxin B, staphylococcalEnterotoxinsVancomycinadjuvant therapymonoclonal antibodyStaphylococcus aureussuperantigenvirulence

Identifiers

PMID24803533
PMCPMC4192055
OpenAlexW2149676037

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.