ArticleInternational urogynecology journal2014
A retrospective comparison of ring pessary and multicomponent behavioral therapy in managing overactive bladder.
Article in International urogynecology journal, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- Heterogeneity in post-intervention prolapse and urinary outcome reporting: a one-year review of the International Urogynecology Journal.International urogynecology journal · 2015Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introduction and hypothesisOveractive bladder (OAB) is a physically, psychologically, and socially disabling condition that affects millions of women worldwide and is especially prevalent postmenopause. The objective of our study was to compare the cure rates of ring pessary with those of multicomponent behavioral therapy in managing overactive bladder.
methodsWe performed a comparative retrospective parallel cohort study of all women whose overactive bladder was treated with multicomponent behavioral therapy or ring pessary over a 42-month period. At the end of the 6-month treatment period, cure was defined as the subjective (self-reported) absence of urinary urgency, frequency, nocturia, and urge incontinence in the preceding 30 days; the objective absence of these symptoms in a 7-day voiding diary; and a Patient Global Impression of Improvement response of "much better" or "very much better."
resultsRing pessary and multicomponent behavioral therapy had similar cure rates (29 out of 150 [19 %] vs 46 out of 231 [20 %] respectively, P = 0.889; OR of 1.04, 95 % confidence interval 0.618-1.742, P = 0.887). They also produced comparable cure rates in premenopausal (4 out of 31 [13 %] vs 14 out of 68 [21 %], P = 0.358) and postmenopausal subjects (25/ out of 19 [21 %] vs 32 out of 163 [20 %], P = 0.776), and in women who had undergone previous treatment (21 out of 108 [19 %] vs 31 out of 176 [18 %], P = 0.699) and those who had not (8 out of 42 [19 %] vs 15 out of 55 [27 %], P = 0.345). Logistic regression showed that neither treatment outcome is significantly associated with demographic characteristics; Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantification at the anterior and posterior vaginal walls and at the vaginal cuff; previous treatment; overactive bladder symptoms; pad usage; or any combination thereof.
conclusionsRing pessary has a cure rate similar to that of multicomponent behavioral therapy in managing overactive bladder.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.