Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24803215›Full record

ArticleInternational urogynecology journal2014

Faecal incontinence 20 years after one birth: a comparison between vaginal delivery and caesarean section.

Maria Gyhagen, Maria Bullarbo, Thorkild F Nielsen, Ian Milsom

Abstract readComparative Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in International urogynecology journal, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
3.3field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 45 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Association of race with anal incontinence in parous women.International urogynecology journal · 2020
    Article
  9. Does flatus incontinence matter?International urogynecology journal · 2019
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Observational
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Can we predict and prevent pelvic floor dysfunction?International urogynecology journal · 2015
    Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Maria GyhagenDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Sahlgrenska Academy at Gothenburg University, Gothenburg, Sweden, maria.gyhagen@vgregion.se.
Maria Bullarbo
Thorkild F Nielsen
Ian Milsom
University of Gothenburg · SESödra Älvsborg Hospital · SE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introduction and hypothesisThe aetiology of bowel incontinence in middle-aged women is multifactorial and the contribution of birth-related factors later in life is still poorly defined. The aim was to assess prevalence, risk factors and severity of faecal (FI, defined as the involuntary loss of faeces-solid or liquid) and anal incontinence (AI, includes FI as well as the involuntary loss of flatus) 20 years after one vaginal (VD) or one caesarean section (CS).

methodsThis was a registry-based national cohort study of primiparae giving birth in 1985-1988 and having no further births (n = 5,236). Data from the Swedish Medical Birth Register were linked to information from a pelvic floor disorder questionnaire in 2008 (response rate 65.2%). Analysis of variance and multivariate analysis were used to obtain adjusted prevalence and odds ratios (adj-OR).

resultsOverall prevalences of FI and AI were 13.6 and 47.0%. FI prevalence was higher after VD compared with CS [14.5 versus 10.6%, adj-OR 1.43, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.16-1.77] but was not increased after acute versus elective CS. Perineal tear (≥second degree) increased the prevalence and risk of FI compared with no tear (22.8 versus 13.9%, adj-OR 1.95, 95% CI 1.33-2.85). The prevalence of FI was lower after VD with an episiotomy (11.1%) and similar to that after CS (10.6%). With each unit increase of current body mass index the odds of FI increased by 6% (OR 1.06, 95% CI 1.04-1.08).

conclusionsLate FI and AI prevalences were higher after VD compared with CS. Perineal tear (≥second degree) versus no tear doubled the prevalence of FI. FI prevalence was similar after a CS and a VD combined with episiotomy.

Indexed as

RegistriesAdultAgedCesarean SectionCohort StudiesFecal IncontinenceFemaleFlatulenceHumansMiddle AgedPregnancyPrevalenceRisk FactorsSwedenTime FactorsYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID24803215
OpenAlexW2071862509

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.