Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24802805›Full record

ArticlePloS one2014

Diabetes Attitude Scale: validation in type-2 diabetes patients in multiple centers in China.

Qingqing Lou, Yufeng Chen, Xiaohui Guo, Li Yuan, Tao Chen, Chun Wang, Li Shen, Zilin Sun, Fang Zhao, Xia Dai and 3 more

Abstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Qingqing LouJiangsu Province Hospital on Integration of Chinese and Western Medicine, Nanjing, Jiangsu Province, China; Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital, Zhejiang University Medical School, Hangzhou, Zhejiang Province, China.
Yufeng ChenSchool of Nursing, Nanjing University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Nanjing, Jiangsu Province, China.
Xiaohui GuoDepartment of Endocrinology, Peking University First Hospital, Beijing, China.
Li YuanDepartment of Endocrinology, West China Medical School, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan Province, China.
Tao ChenDepartment of Endocrinology, West China Medical School, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan Province, China.
Chun WangDepartment of Endocrinology, West China Medical School, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan Province, China.
Li ShenPeking University First Hospital, Beijing, China.
Zilin SunInstitute of Diabetes, Zhongda Hospital, Medical School, Southeast University, Nanjing, Jiangsu Province, China.
Fang ZhaoDepartment of Endocrinology, China-Japan Friendship Hospital, Beijing, China.
Xia DaiFirst Affiliated Hospital, Guangxi Medical University, Nanning, Jiangsu Province, China.
Jin HuangThe Second Xiangya Hospital of Central South University, Changsha, Hunan Province, China.
Huiying YangThe First Affiliated Hospital of Kunming Medical College, Kunming, Yunnan Province, China.
Chinese Diabetes Education Status Survey study group

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThe aim of the paper is to report the development and psychometric testing of Diabetes Attitude Scale.

methodA prospective study was performed. The cultural equivalency and content validity of the Diabetes Attitude Scale were determined by panels of endocrinologists, physiologists, nurses and dieticians. An accurate and usable translation was obtained for each of five subscales examining attitudes on need for special training, the seriousness of type-2 diabetes, the need for controlling the condition, its psychosocial impact and the degree of autonomy given to patients in decision making. The validation was derived from 5961 patients with type-2 diabetes, recruited from 50 centers in 29 provinces throughout China between March 1st and September 30th, 2010.

resultsThe modified Diabetes Attitude Scale showed an acceptable level of internal consistency. The strength of the inter-correlations among the domains of five subscales suggests that the instrument measures related but separate domains of patients' attitudes toward diabetes. Moreover, the test-retest intraclass correlation coefficients were high enough to support the stability of the Chinese version of the third version of the scale.

conclusionsThe psychometric properties of the Chinese version of Diabetes Attitude Scale demonstrated satisfactory validity and reliability and appeared to effectively evaluate attitudes toward diabetes in patients with type-2 diabetes.

Indexed as

Attitude to HealthChinaDecision MakingDiabetes Mellitus, Type 2FemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedProspective StudiesPsychometricsReproducibility of ResultsSurveys and Questionnaires

Identifiers

PMID24802805
PMCPMC4011833

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.