Trial reportClinical drug investigation2014
Tolerability and pharmacokinetics of lobeglitazone, a novel peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-γ agonist, after a single oral administration in healthy female subjects.
Trial report in Clinical drug investigation, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- No Relevant Pharmacokinetic Drug-Drug Interaction Between the Sodium-Glucose Co-Transporter-2 Inhibitor Empagliflozin and Lobeglitazone, a Peroxisome Proliferator-Activated Receptor-γ Agonist, in Healthy Subjects.Drug design, development and therapy · 2021Trial
- Lack of the effect of lobeglitazone, a peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-γ agonist, on the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of warfarin.Drug design, development and therapy · 2015Trial
- Clinical pharmacology and therapeutics in South Korea: 30 years with the Korean Society of Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics.Translational and clinical pharmacology · 2024Article
- Review
- Lobeglitazone: A Novel Thiazolidinedione for the Management of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus.Diabetes & metabolism journal · 2021Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND
objectivesLobeglitazone is a recently approved peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-γ agonist for the treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus in Korea. The purpose of this study was to investigate the pharmaco kinetic properties of lobeglitazone in healthy females and to compare these with historical data in healthy males.
methodsThis study was designed as a block-randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group study. A single 2 or 4 mg oral dose of lobeglitazone or a placebo was randomly administered to 22 female subjects, and pharmacokinetic blood samples were obtained after dosing. Pharmacokinetic parameters were calculated by a non-compartmental method, and the results were compared with those previously obtained from male subjects. Tolerability was assessed by clinical and laboratory parameters.
resultsDuring the study, a total of 28 adverse events (AEs) were observed in the lobeglitazone group (n = 16) and nine AEs in the placebo group (n = 6). Serious AEs or significant clinical changes were not observed. After oral administration, lobeglitazone was rapidly absorbed with the time to maximum plasma concentration (t(max)) ranging from 0.5 to 4.0 h. The mean (standard deviation) maximum plasma concentration (C(max)) and area under the plasma concentration-time curve from time zero to infinity (AUC(∞)) for the 2 mg dose were 214.8 (56.4) µg/L and 2,251.3 (721.2) µg·h/L, respectively, and the corresponding values for the 4 mg dose were 310.0 (47.8) µg/L and 6,942.6 (1,778.9) µg·h/L, respectively. The ratios (95 % CIs) for the geometric means (female/male) of the C(max) and AUC∞ were 1.23 (0.89-1.69) and 1.11 (0.73-1.68), respectively (2 mg), and 1.28 (1.01-1.63) and 2.36 (1.60-3.47), respectively (4 mg).
conclusionLobeglitazone was well-tolerated in healthy females. There was no sex difference for systemic lobeglitazone exposure at a 2 mg dose; however, female subjects showed greater systemic exposure than males after the administration of 4 mg of lobeglitazone. In spite of the pharmacokinetic difference, dose adjustment based on sex alone is not needed in clinical use because therapy should be individualized for each patient to achieve glycemic control.
Indexed as
Identifiers
24802657What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.