ArticleJournal of chemical information and modeling2014
Prediction of substrates for glutathione transferases by covalent docking.
Article in Journal of chemical information and modeling, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.
- Structure-based rational design of covalent probes.Communications chemistry · 2025Review
- Perilipin 5 regulates hepatic stellate cell activation and high-fat diet-induced non-alcoholic fatty liver disease.Animal models and experimental medicine · 2024Article
- Advanced approaches of developing targeted covalent drugs.RSC medicinal chemistry · 2022Review
- Systematic Studies on the Protocol and Criteria for Selecting a Covalent Docking Tool.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2019Article
- Recent Trends and Applications of Molecular Modeling in GPCR⁻Ligand Recognition and Structure-Based Drug Design.International journal of molecular sciences · 2018Review
- Building protein-protein interaction networks for Leishmania species through protein structural information.BMC bioinformatics · 2018Article
- An approach to functionally relevant clustering of the protein universe: Active site profile-based clustering of protein structures and sequences.Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society · 2017Article
- Targeting Non-Catalytic Cysteine Residues Through Structure-Guided Drug Discovery.Current topics in medicinal chemistry · 2017Review
- Docking Screens for Novel Ligands Conferring New Biology.Journal of medicinal chemistry · 2016Review
- Enzyme Function Initiative-Enzyme Similarity Tool (EFI-EST): A web tool for generating protein sequence similarity networks.Biochimica et biophysica acta · 2015Review
- Theory and applications of covalent docking in drug discovery: merits and pitfalls.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2015Review
- Covalent docking predicts substrates for haloalkanoate dehalogenase superfamily phosphatases.Biochemistry · 2015Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors at 5 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
Abstract
Enzymes in the glutathione transferase (GST) superfamily catalyze the conjugation of glutathione (GSH) to electrophilic substrates. As a consequence they are involved in a number of key biological processes, including protection of cells against chemical damage, steroid and prostaglandin biosynthesis, tyrosine catabolism, and cell apoptosis. Although virtual screening has been used widely to discover substrates by docking potential noncovalent ligands into active site clefts of enzymes, docking has been rarely constrained by a covalent bond between the enzyme and ligand. In this study, we investigate the accuracy of docking poses and substrate discovery in the GST superfamily, by docking 6738 potential ligands from the KEGG and MetaCyc compound libraries into 14 representative GST enzymes with known structures and substrates using the PLOP program [ Jacobson Proteins 2004 , 55 , 351 ]. For X-ray structures as receptors, one of the top 3 ranked models is within 3 Å all-atom root mean square deviation (RMSD) of the native complex in 11 of the 14 cases; the enrichment LogAUC value is better than random in all cases, and better than 25 in 7 of 11 cases. For comparative models as receptors, near-native ligand-enzyme configurations are often sampled but difficult to rank highly. For models based on templates with the highest sequence identity, the enrichment LogAUC is better than 25 in 5 of 11 cases, not significantly different from the crystal structures. In conclusion, we show that covalent docking can be a useful tool for substrate discovery and point out specific challenges for future method improvement.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.