Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24802593›Full record

ArticlePloS one2014

Cost drivers for voluntary medical male circumcision using primary source data from sub-Saharan Africa.

Lori Bollinger, Adebiyi Adesina, Steven Forsythe, Ramona Godbole, Elan Reuben, Emmanuel Njeuhmeli

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Trends in the Marginal Cost of Male Circumcision in Rural Rakai Uganda.Journal of acquired immune deficiency syndromes (1999) · 2016
    Article
  14. VMMC Devices-Introducing a New Innovation to a Public Health Intervention.Journal of acquired immune deficiency syndromes (1999) · 2016
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Lori BollingerHealth Policy Initiative Costing Task Order, Washington, District of Columbia, United States of America; Health Policy Project, Washington, District of Columbia, United States of America; Futures Institute, Glastonbury, Connecticut, United States of America.
Adebiyi AdesinaHealth Policy Initiative Costing Task Order, Washington, District of Columbia, United States of America; Health Policy Project, Washington, District of Columbia, United States of America; Futures Institute, Glastonbury, Connecticut, United States of America.
Steven ForsytheHealth Policy Initiative Costing Task Order, Washington, District of Columbia, United States of America; Health Policy Project, Washington, District of Columbia, United States of America; Futures Institute, Glastonbury, Connecticut, United States of America.
Ramona GodboleHealth Policy Initiative Costing Task Order, Washington, District of Columbia, United States of America; Health Policy Project, Washington, District of Columbia, United States of America; Futures Group, Washington, District of Columbia, United States of America; United States Agency for International Development, Washington, District of Columbia, United States of America.
Elan ReubenUnited States Agency for International Development, Washington, District of Columbia, United States of America.
Emmanuel NjeuhmeliUnited States Agency for International Development, Washington, District of Columbia, United States of America.

Funding

PEPFAR
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAs voluntary medical male circumcision (VMMC) programs scale up, there is a pressing need for information about the important cost drivers, and potential efficiency gains. We examine those cost drivers here, and estimate the potential efficiency gains through an econometric model. METHODS AND

findingsWe examined the main cost drivers (i.e., personnel and consumables) associated with providing VMMC in sub-Saharan Africa along a number of dimensions, including facility type and service provider. Primary source facility level data from Kenya, Namibia, South Africa, Tanzania, Uganda, and Zambia were utilized throughout. We estimated the efficiency gains by econometrically estimating a cost function in order to calculate the impact of scale and other relevant factors. Personnel and consumables were estimated at 36% and 28%, respectively, of total costs across countries. Economies of scale (EOS) is estimated to be eight at the median volume of VMMCs performed, and EOS falls from 23 at the 25th percentile volume of VMMCs performed to 5.1 at the 75th percentile.

conclusionsThe analysis suggests that there is significant room for efficiency improvement as indicated by declining EOS as VMMC volume increases. The scale of the fall in EOS as VMMC volume increases suggests that we are still at the ascension phase of the scale-up of VMMC, where continuing to add new sites results in additional start-up costs as well. A key aspect of improving efficiency is task sharing VMMC procedures, due to the large percentage of overall costs associated with personnel costs. In addition, efficiency improvements in consumables are likely to occur over time as prices and distribution costs decrease.

Indexed as

Cost-Benefit AnalysisAfrica South of the SaharaCircumcision, MaleHumansMale

Identifiers

PMID24802593
PMCPMC4011577

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC0
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.