Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24802193›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging2014

Role of ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT in the diagnosis of infective endocarditis in patients with an implanted cardiac device: a prospective study.

Maddalena Graziosi, Cristina Nanni, Massimiliano Lorenzini, Igor Diemberger, Rachele Bonfiglioli, Ferdinando Pasquale, Matteo Ziacchi, Mauro Biffi, Cristian Martignani, Michele Bartoletti and 5 more

Open access · greenAbstract readEvaluation Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
6.4field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 82 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Meta-analysis of 18F-FDG PET/CT in the diagnosis of infective endocarditis.Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology · 2019
    Pooled it
  2. Role ofJournal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology · 2019
    Pooled it
  3. Assessment of the diagnostic accuracy ofEuropean journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2016
    Trial
  4. Review
  5. Observational
  6. Innovations in Imaging:Current cardiology reports · 2024
    Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology · 2022
    Article
  12. Accuracy ofJournal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology · 2022
    Article
  13. Nuclear Imaging in Infective Endocarditis.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021
    Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Usefulness ofJournal of clinical medicine · 2020
    Article
  19. Review
  20. Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology · 2019
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Maddalena GraziosiCardiology Unit, Department of Experimental, Diagnostic and Specialty Medicine, Alma Mater-University of Bologna, and S. Orsola-Malpighi Hospital, Via Massarenti 9, 40138, Bologna, Italy.
Cristina Nanni
Massimiliano Lorenzini
Igor Diemberger
Rachele Bonfiglioli
Ferdinando Pasquale
Matteo Ziacchi
Mauro Biffi
Cristian Martignani
Michele Bartoletti
Fabio Tumietto
Giuseppe Boriani
Pier Luigi Viale
Stefano Fanti
Claudio Rapezzi
Policlinico S.Orsola-Malpighi · ITUniversity of Bologna · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeInfective endocarditis (IE) is widely underdiagnosed or diagnosed after a major delay. The diagnosis is currently based on the modified DUKE criteria, where the only validated imaging technique is echocardiography, and remains challenging especially in patients with an implantable cardiac device. The aim of this study was to assess the incremental diagnostic role of (18)F-FDG PET/CT in patients with an implanted cardiac device and suspected IE.

methodsWe prospectively analysed 27 consecutive patients with an implantable device evaluated for suspected device-related IE between January 2011 and June 2013. The diagnostic probability of IE was defined at presentation according to the modified DUKE criteria. PET/CT was performed as soon as possible following the clinical suspicion of IE. Patients then underwent medical or surgical treatment based on the overall clinical evaluation. During follow-up, we considered: lead cultures in patients who underwent extraction, direct inspection and lead cultures in those who underwent surgery, and a clinical/instrumental reevaluation after at least 6 months in patients who received antimicrobial treatment or had an alternative diagnosis and were not treated for IE. After the follow-up period, the diagnosis was systematically reviewed by the multidisciplinary team using the modified DUKE criteria and considering the new findings.

resultsAmong the ten patients with a positive PET/CT scan, seven received a final diagnosis of "definite IE", one of "possible IE" and two of "IE rejected". Among the 17 patients with a negative PET/CT scan, four were false-negative and received a final diagnosis of definite IE. These patients underwent PET/CT after having started antibiotic therapy (≥48 h) or had a technically suboptimal examination.

conclusionIn patients with a cardiac device, PET/CT increases the diagnostic accuracy of the modified Duke criteria for IE, particularly in the subset of patients with possible IE in whom it may help the clinician manage a challenging situation.

Indexed as

Fluorodeoxyglucose F18Multimodal ImagingPositron-Emission TomographyRadiopharmaceuticalsTomography, X-Ray ComputedAgedDefibrillators, ImplantableEndocarditis, BacterialFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedSensitivity and SpecificityFluorodeoxyglucose F18Radiopharmaceuticals

Identifiers

PMID24802193
OpenAlexW2003244454

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.