ArticleJournal of clinical monitoring and computing2015
Accuracy of bedside glucometry in critically ill children with peripheral hypoperfusion.
Article in Journal of clinical monitoring and computing, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The accuracy of glucose test strip in critically care has been questioned. We investigated the accuracy of glucose test strip in critically ill children. Patients, aged from 1 month to 18 years admitted in pediatric intensive care unit. Demographic data, hemodynamic parameters, and perfusion index (PI) were recorded. Glucose test strips were performed from finger stick blood [capillary blood glucose (CBG)] and from whole blood [whole blood glucose (WBG)] along with laboratory plasma blood glucose (PBG) from either arterial or venous blood samples. The accuracy of glucose test strips was defined according to ISO 15197 and Clarke error grid (CEG). One hundred and eighty one blood samplings including 117 arterial blood (CBG, WBGa, PBGa) and 64 venous blood (CBG, WBGv, PBGv) were obtained. The accuracy of WBGa was 98.3 and 95.2% when compared to the accuracy of CBG (88.7 and 83.3%. The accuracy of WBGv was 92.2% and 87.0 when compared to the accuracy of CBG which was 79.7 and 72.9% (ISO 15197: 2003 and 2013, respectively). Bland-Altman plot demonstrated bias and precision of 7.4±17.7 mg/dL in acceptable PI group compared to 30.2±23.4 mg/dL in low PI group (PI≤0.3). The CBG test strip must be interpreted carefully in critically ill children. A low PI was associated with poor CBG strip accuracy. WBG test strip from arterial blood was more appropriate for glucose monitoring in children with peripheral hypoperfusion.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.