Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24801344›Full record

ReviewChromosome research : an international journal on the molecular, supramolecular and evolutionary aspects of chromosome biology2014

Genomic variation in Arabidopsis: tools and insights from next-generation sequencing.

Jesse D Hollister

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Chromosome research : an international journal on the molecular, supramolecular and evolutionary aspects of chromosome biology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Chromosome-level assembly of Arabidopsis thaliana Ler reveals the extent of translocation and inversion polymorphisms.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2016
    Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Jesse D HollisterDepartment of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of Toronto, 25 Willcocks Street, Toronto, ON, M5S 1G8, Canada, jesse.hollister@utoronto.ca.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The release of a reference genome for Arabidopsis thaliana in 2000 has been an enormous boon for the study of plant genetics. Less than a decade later, however, a revolution in sequencing technology had enabled rapid and inexpensive re-sequencing of whole A. thaliana genomes. Large-scale efforts to characterize natural genomic variation in A. thaliana have revealed remarkable intra-specific variation in this species, ranging from single-nucleotide differences to large structural rearrangements. The partitioning of this variation by geography and local adaptation has been described using powerful new methods and tools. Simultaneously, an ambitious research agenda has emerged to sequence 1001 A. thaliana lines from around the world, while sequencing of related species is enabling powerful evolutionary genomic analyses. In this review, I summarize recent progress in genomic analysis of natural variation in A. thaliana and its close relatives. This progress has set the stage for the emergence of Arabidopsis as a model genus for evolutionary and functional genomics.

Indexed as

Genome, PlantArabidopsisDNA, PlantEpigenomicsEvolution, MolecularGenomicsHaplotypesHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingPhylogeographyPolymorphism, Single NucleotideSequence Analysis, DNADNA, Plant

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.