Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24800820›Full record

ArticlePloS one2014

Profiling of olfactory receptor gene expression in whole human olfactory mucosa.

Christophe Verbeurgt, Françoise Wilkin, Maxime Tarabichi, Françoise Gregoire, Jacques E Dumont, Pierre Chatelain

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 51 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
51citing papers in PubMed
6.0field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

51 citing papers in PubMed, 134 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Beyond olfaction: New insights into human odorant binding proteins.Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society · 2026
    Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Age-related decrease of odorant sensitivity for a selection of nine diverse molecules.European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Olfactory Function and Olfactory Disorders.Laryngo- rhino- otologie · 2023
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Correlation between olfactory function, age, sex, and cognitive reserve index in the Italian population.European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery · 2022
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Christophe VerbeurgtDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology, Erasme University Hospital, Brussels, Belgium.
Françoise WilkinChemCom S.A., Brussels, Belgium.
Maxime TarabichiInstitute of Interdisciplinary Research in human and molecular Biology, Free University of Brussels, Brussels, Belgium.
Françoise GregoireLaboratory of Pathophysiological and Nutritional Biochemistry, Department of Biochemistry, Free University of Brussels, Brussels, Belgium.
Jacques E DumontInstitute of Interdisciplinary Research in human and molecular Biology, Free University of Brussels, Brussels, Belgium.
Pierre ChatelainChemCom S.A., Brussels, Belgium.
Erasmus Hospital · BE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Olfactory perception is mediated by a large array of olfactory receptor genes. The human genome contains 851 olfactory receptor gene loci. More than 50% of the loci are annotated as nonfunctional due to frame-disrupting mutations. Furthermore haplotypic missense alleles can be nonfunctional resulting from substitution of key amino acids governing protein folding or interactions with signal transduction components. Beyond their role in odor recognition, functional olfactory receptors are also required for a proper targeting of olfactory neuron axons to their corresponding glomeruli in the olfactory bulb. Therefore, we anticipate that profiling of olfactory receptor gene expression in whole human olfactory mucosa and analysis in the human population of their expression should provide an opportunity to select the frequently expressed and potentially functional olfactory receptors in view of a systematic deorphanization. To address this issue, we designed a TaqMan Low Density Array (Applied Biosystems), containing probes for 356 predicted human olfactory receptor loci to investigate their expression in whole human olfactory mucosa tissues from 26 individuals (13 women, 13 men; aged from 39 to 81 years, with an average of 67±11 years for women and 63±12 years for men). Total RNA isolation, DNase treatment, RNA integrity evaluation and reverse transcription were performed for these 26 samples. Then 384 targeted genes (including endogenous control genes and reference genes specifically expressed in olfactory epithelium for normalization purpose) were analyzed using the same real-time reverse transcription PCR platform. On average, the expression of 273 human olfactory receptor genes was observed in the 26 selected whole human olfactory mucosa analyzed, of which 90 were expressed in all 26 individuals. Most of the olfactory receptors deorphanized to date on the basis of sensitivity to known odorant molecules, which are described in the literature, were found in the expressed olfactory receptors gene set.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAged, 80 and overAxonsFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedOlfactory BulbOlfactory MucosaOlfactory PerceptionOlfactory Receptor NeuronsReceptors, OdorantSignal TransductionSmellTranscriptomeReceptors, Odorant

Identifiers

PMID24800820
PMCPMC4011832
OpenAlexW1993030431

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.