Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24800241›Full record

ArticleBioMed research international2014

Reduced bone and body mass in young male rats exposed to lead.

Fellipe Augusto Tocchini de Figueiredo, Raquel Fernanda Gerlach, Márcia Andreia Mesquita Silva da Veiga, Flavio Venancio Nakadi, Junia Ramos, Erika Reiko Kawakita, Carolina de Souza Guerra, João Paulo Mardegan Issa

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BioMed research international, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Assessment of Bone Turnover Biomarkers in Lead-Battery Workers with Long-Term Exposure to Lead.The international journal of occupational and environmental medicine · 2020
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Fellipe Augusto Tocchini de FigueiredoFaculdade de Odontologia de Ribeirao Preto, Universidade de Sao Paulo, Avenida do Cafe S/N, 14040-904 Ribeirao Preto, SP, Brazil.
Raquel Fernanda GerlachFaculdade de Odontologia de Ribeirao Preto, Universidade de Sao Paulo, Avenida do Cafe S/N, 14040-904 Ribeirao Preto, SP, Brazil.
Márcia Andreia Mesquita Silva da VeigaFaculdade de Filosofia Ciencias e Letras de Ribeirao Preto, Universidade de Sao Paulo, Avenida do Cafe S/N, 14040-904 Ribeirao Preto, SP, Brazil.
Flavio Venancio NakadiFaculdade de Filosofia Ciencias e Letras de Ribeirao Preto, Universidade de Sao Paulo, Avenida do Cafe S/N, 14040-904 Ribeirao Preto, SP, Brazil.
Junia RamosFaculdade de Odontologia de Ribeirao Preto, Universidade de Sao Paulo, Avenida do Cafe S/N, 14040-904 Ribeirao Preto, SP, Brazil.
Erika Reiko KawakitaFaculdade de Odontologia de Ribeirao Preto, Universidade de Sao Paulo, Avenida do Cafe S/N, 14040-904 Ribeirao Preto, SP, Brazil.
Carolina de Souza GuerraFaculdade de Odontologia de Ribeirao Preto, Universidade de Sao Paulo, Avenida do Cafe S/N, 14040-904 Ribeirao Preto, SP, Brazil.
João Paulo Mardegan IssaFaculdade de Odontologia de Ribeirao Preto, Universidade de Sao Paulo, Avenida do Cafe S/N, 14040-904 Ribeirao Preto, SP, Brazil.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The aim of this study was to see whether there would be differences in whole blood versus tibia lead concentrations over time in growing rats prenatally. Lead was given in the drinking water at 30 mg/L from the time the dams were pregnant until offspring was 28- or 60-day-old. Concentrations of lead were measured in whole blood and in tibia after 28 (28D) and 60 days (60D) in control (C) and in lead-exposed animals (Pb). Lead measurements were made by GF-AAS. There was no significant difference (P > 0.05) in the concentration of whole blood lead between Pb-28D (8.0 ± 1.1  μg/dL) and Pb-60D (7.2 ± 0.89  μg/dL), while both significantly varied (P < 0.01) from controls (0.2  μg/dL). Bone lead concentrations significantly varied between the Pb-28D (8.02 ± 1.12  μg/g) and the Pb-60D (43.3 ± 13.26  μg/g) lead-exposed groups (P < 0.01), while those exposed groups were also significantly higher (P < 0.0001) than the 28D and 60D control groups (Pb < 1  μg/g). The Pb-60D group showed a 25% decrease in tibia mass as compared to the respective control. The five times higher amount of lead found in the bone of older animals (Pb-60D versus Pb-28D), which reinforces the importance of using bone lead as an exposure biomarker.

Indexed as

AnimalsBody WeightFemaleLeadMaleMaternal ExposurePregnancyRatsTibiaLead

Identifiers

PMID24800241
PMCPMC3988974

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.