Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24800205›Full record

ArticleBioMed research international2014

Diagnostic value of virtual touch tissue quantification for breast lesions with different size.

Minghua Yao, Jian Wu, Liling Zou, Guang Xu, Juan Xie, Rong Wu, Huixiong Xu

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in BioMed research international, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Update on Breast Cancer Detection Using Comb-Push Ultrasound Shear Elastography.IEEE transactions on ultrasonics, ferroelectrics, and frequency control · 2015
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Minghua YaoDepartment of Ultrasound in Medicine, Shanghai Tenth People's Hospital, Tongji University School of Medicine, No. 301, Yanchangzhong Road, Zhabei, Shanghai 200072, China.
Jian WuDepartment of Ultrasound in Medicine, Shanghai Tenth People's Hospital, Tongji University School of Medicine, No. 301, Yanchangzhong Road, Zhabei, Shanghai 200072, China.
Liling ZouDepartment of Health Statistics, Tongji University School of Medicine, Shanghai 200072, China.
Guang XuDepartment of Ultrasound in Medicine, Shanghai Tenth People's Hospital, Tongji University School of Medicine, No. 301, Yanchangzhong Road, Zhabei, Shanghai 200072, China.
Juan XieDepartment of Ultrasound in Medicine, Shanghai Tenth People's Hospital, Tongji University School of Medicine, No. 301, Yanchangzhong Road, Zhabei, Shanghai 200072, China.
Rong WuDepartment of Ultrasound in Medicine, Shanghai Tenth People's Hospital, Tongji University School of Medicine, No. 301, Yanchangzhong Road, Zhabei, Shanghai 200072, China.
Huixiong XuDepartment of Ultrasound in Medicine, Shanghai Tenth People's Hospital, Tongji University School of Medicine, No. 301, Yanchangzhong Road, Zhabei, Shanghai 200072, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo evaluate diagnostic value of the virtual touch tissue quantification (VTTQ) for breast lesions with different sizes. MATERIALS AND

methodsPatients with 206 breast lesions were categorized into three groups according to lesion size (<10 mm, 10-20 mm, and >20 mm). Breast lesions were examined by conventional ultrasound and VTTQ, and shear wave velocity (SWV) of each lesion and adjacent normal breast tissue were measured. Diagnoses were confirmed by pathological examination after surgery. The receiver-operating characteristic curve (ROC) analyses were performed to evaluate the diagnostic value of SWV, and the area under curves (AUC) was compared among groups.

resultsSWV of malignant lesions was much higher than that of benign lesions, whereas the difference was not obvious for lesions <10 mm (P = 0.15). There was statistical significant difference of AUC between lesions <10 mm and 10-20 mm (P < 0.05), as well as lesions <10 mm and >20 mm (P < 0.05). The sensitivity of lesions <10 mm was 33.33%, which was relatively low compared to other groups.

conclusionAccording to our results, VTTQ is a promising method for breast lesions >10 mm, and further studies were warranted to improve sensitivity of VTTQ for breast lesions <10 mm.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsAdultAgedAged, 80 and overBreast NeoplasmsElasticity Imaging TechniquesElastic ModulusFemaleHumansImage EnhancementImage Interpretation, Computer-AssistedMiddle AgedPalpationReproducibility of ResultsSensitivity and SpecificityUser-Computer Interface

Identifiers

PMID24800205
PMCPMC3996890

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.