Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24800135›Full record

SynthesisMedicare & medicaid research review2012

Methodological issues in using multiple years of the Medicare current beneficiary survey.

Becky A Briesacher, Jennifer Tjia, Chyke A Doubeni, Yong Chen, Sowmya R Rao

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Medicare & medicaid research review, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Comorbidity Subgroups Among Medicare Beneficiaries Seeking Health Care for Musculoskeletal Pain.The journals of gerontology. Series A, Biological sciences and medical sciences · 2019
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Observational
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Observational
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Becky A BriesacherUniversity of Massachusetts Medical School, Meyers Primary Care Institute, HealthCore Inc., and Bedford VA Medical Center.
Jennifer TjiaUniversity of Massachusetts Medical School, Meyers Primary Care Institute, HealthCore Inc., and Bedford VA Medical Center.
Chyke A DoubeniUniversity of Massachusetts Medical School, Meyers Primary Care Institute, HealthCore Inc., and Bedford VA Medical Center.
Yong ChenUniversity of Massachusetts Medical School, Meyers Primary Care Institute, HealthCore Inc., and Bedford VA Medical Center.
Sowmya R RaoUniversity of Massachusetts Medical School, Meyers Primary Care Institute, HealthCore Inc., and Bedford VA Medical Center.

Funding

Understanding Racial and Ethnic Differences in Survival from Colorectal CancerK01CA127118 · NCI · UNIV OF MASSACHUSETTS MED SCH WORCESTER · PI DOUBENI, CHYKE ABADAMA · 2007 to 2011
$773k
Cost-related Underuse of Medications and the Health of Older AdultsK01AG031836 · NIA · UNIV OF MASSACHUSETTS MED SCH WORCESTER · PI BRIESACHER, BECKY A · 2008 to 2012
$679k
Effectiveness of Screening Colonoscopy in Reducing Deaths from Colorectal CancerR01CA151736 · NCI · UNIV OF MASSACHUSETTS MED SCH WORCESTER · PI DOUBENI, CHYKE ABADAMA · 2010 to 2010
$491k
NCI NIH HHS 5 K01 CA127118NCI NIH HHS K01 CA127118NCI NIH HHS R01 CA151736NCI NIH HHS R01CA151736NIA NIH HHS K01 AG031836NIA NIH HHS K01AG031836
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe analysis presented in this paper examines the multi-year capacity of the Medicare Current Beneficiary Survey (MCBS).

methodsWe systematically reviewed the literature for methodological approaches in research using multiple years of the MCBS and categorized the studies by study design, use of survey sampling weights, and variance adjustments. We then replicated the approaches in an empirical demonstration using functional status (activities of daily living (ADL) and 2005-2007 MCBS data.

resultsIn the systematic review, we identified 22 pooled, 17 repeated cross-sectional, and 17 longitudinal studies. Less than half of these studies explicitly described the weighting approach or variance estimation. In the empirical demonstration, we showed that different study designs and weighting approaches will yield statistically different estimates.

conclusionThere is a variety of methodological approaches when using multiple years of the MCBS, and some of them provide biased results. Research needs to improve in describing the methods and preferred approaches for using these complex data.

Indexed as

Activities of Daily LivingCross-Sectional StudiesHealth Care SurveysHumansLongitudinal StudiesMedicareSampling StudiesUnited StatesHealth Care SurveysMedicare current beneficiary surveySASSUDAANSurvey designSurvey sampling weightSystematic review

Identifiers

PMID24800135
PMCPMC4006385

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.