Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24799902›Full record

ArticleJournal of cancer epidemiology2014

Cancer risks for relatives of children with cancer.

John A Heath, Elizabeth Smibert, Elizabeth M Algar, Gillian S Dite, John L Hopper

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of cancer epidemiology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

John A HeathChildren's Cancer Centre, Royal Children's Hospital, Flemington Road, Parkville, VIC 3052, Australia ; Centre for Molecular, Environmental, Genetic and Analytic Epidemiology, School of Population and Global Health, University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC 3053, Australia.
Elizabeth SmibertChildren's Cancer Centre, Royal Children's Hospital, Flemington Road, Parkville, VIC 3052, Australia.
Elizabeth M AlgarChildren's Cancer Centre, Royal Children's Hospital, Flemington Road, Parkville, VIC 3052, Australia ; Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Parkville, VIC 3052, Australia.
Gillian S DiteCentre for Molecular, Environmental, Genetic and Analytic Epidemiology, School of Population and Global Health, University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC 3053, Australia.
John L HopperCentre for Molecular, Environmental, Genetic and Analytic Epidemiology, School of Population and Global Health, University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC 3053, Australia.
University of Melbourne · AUMurdoch Children's Research Institute · AURoyal Children's Hospital · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We determined the extent and distribution of cancers in relatives of 379 children newly diagnosed with cancer. Family history was collected from 1,337 first-degree and 3,399 second-degree relatives and incidence compared with national age- and gender-specific rates. Overall, 14 children (3.7%) had a relative with a history of childhood cancer and 26 children (6.9%) had a first-degree relative with a history of cancer, with only one of these having an identifiable familial cancer syndrome. There was a higher than expected incidence of childhood cancer among first-degree relatives (parents and siblings) (standardized incidence ratio (SIR) 1.43; 95% CI 0.54-5.08). There was also a higher than expected incidence of adult cancers among first-degree relatives (SIR 1.45; 95% CI 0.93-2.21), particularly in females (SIR 1.82; 95% CI 1.26-3.39). The increased family cancer history in first-degree females was largely attributable to an effect in mothers (SIR 1.78; 95% CI 1.27-3.33). The gender-specific association was reflected in higher than expected incidence rates of breast cancer in both mothers (SIR 1.92; 95% CI 0.72-6.83) and aunts (SIR 1.64; 95% CI 0.98-2.94). These findings support the hypothesis that previously undetected familial cancer syndromes contribute to childhood cancer.

Identifiers

PMID24799902
PMCPMC3985329
OpenAlexW2069411394

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.