Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24799767›Full record

ReviewMediators of inflammation2014

C-reactive protein in human atherogenesis: facts and fiction.

Oliver Zimmermann, Kefei Li, Myron Zaczkiewicz, Matthias Graf, Zhongmin Liu, Jan Torzewski

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Mediators of inflammation, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.2field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 34 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Effect of Extra Virgin Olive Oil on Biomarkers of Inflammation in HIV-Infected Patients: A Randomized, Crossover, Controlled Clinical Trial.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2015
    Trial
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. C-reactive protein as a marker of melanoma progression.Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology · 2015
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Oliver ZimmermannCardiovascular Center Oberallgäu-Kempten, Robert Weixler Street 50, 87439 Kempten, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-7021-7411
Kefei LiSino-German Heart Centre, Shanghai East Hospital, Shanghai, China.
Myron ZaczkiewiczCardiovascular Center Oberallgäu-Kempten, Robert Weixler Street 50, 87439 Kempten, Germany.
Matthias GrafCardiovascular Center Oberallgäu-Kempten, Robert Weixler Street 50, 87439 Kempten, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-8088-857X
Zhongmin LiuSino-German Heart Centre, Shanghai East Hospital, Shanghai, China.
Jan TorzewskiCardiovascular Center Oberallgäu-Kempten, Robert Weixler Street 50, 87439 Kempten, Germany.
Kempten University of Applied Sciences · DEShanghai East Hospital · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The role of C-reactive protein (CRP) in atherosclerosis is controversially discussed. Whereas initial experimental studies suggested a pathogenic role for CRP in atherogenesis, more recent genetic data from Mendelian randomization trials failed to provide evidence for a causative role of CRP in cardiovascular disease. Also, experimental results from laboratories all over the world were indeed contradictory, partly because of species differences in CRP biology and partly because data were not accurately evaluated. Here we summarize the published data from experimental work with mainly human material in order to avoid confusion based on species differences in CRP biology. Experimental work needs to be reevaluated after reconsideration of some traditional rules in research: (1) in order to understand a molecule's role in disease it may be helpful to be aware of its role in physiology; (2) it is necessary to define the disease entity that experimental CRP research deals with; (3) the scientific consensus is as follows: do not try to prove your hypothesis. Specific CRP inhibition followed by use of CRP inhibitors in controlled clinical trials may be the only way to prove or disprove a causative role for CRP in cardiovascular disease.

Indexed as

AtherosclerosisCardiovascular DiseasesC-Reactive ProteinHumansC-Reactive Protein

Identifiers

PMID24799767
PMCPMC3995305
OpenAlexW2111822588

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.