ArticleThe Canadian journal of hospital pharmacy2014
Should key performance indicators be a component of performance assessment for individual clinical pharmacists?
Article in The Canadian journal of hospital pharmacy, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- What Clinical Pharmacy Key Performance Indicator Processes of Care Were Patients Receiving across Canada in 2018? A National Patient Registry and Pooled Analysis.The Canadian journal of hospital pharmacy · 2025Article
- Optimizing Pharmacy Learner Rotations to Improve Clinical Productivity: A Study to Assess 3 Pharmacy Layered Learning Practice Models in an Inpatient Tertiary Care Oncology Unit.The Canadian journal of hospital pharmacy · 2021Article
- Marriage of individual pharmacists' achievement on key performance indicators and teaching responsibilities.The Canadian journal of hospital pharmacy · 2014Article
- Impact of a Layered Learning Practice Model on Delivery of Clinical Pharmacy Key Performance Indicators under a Tertiary Care Centre Oncology Service.The Canadian journal of hospital pharmacyArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
0 authors at 6 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.