Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24799563›Full record

ArticleJournal of experimental botany2014

Regulation of photosynthesis and stomatal and mesophyll conductance under water stress and recovery in olive trees: correlation with gene expression of carbonic anhydrase and aquaporins.

Alfonso Perez-Martin, Chiara Michelazzo, Jose M Torres-Ruiz, Jaume Flexas, José E Fernández, Luca Sebastiani, Antonio Diaz-Espejo

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of experimental botany, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 59 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
59citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
11.9field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

59 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 206 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. COPlanta · 2023
    Review
  17. Features of Photosynthesis inPlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Alfonso Perez-MartinGroup of Irrigation and Crop Ecophysiology, Instituto de Recursos Naturales y Agrobiología, IRNAS-CSIC, Apartado 1052, 41080, Sevilla, Spain.
Chiara MichelazzoBiolabs, ISV, Scuola Superiore Sant'Anna, Piazza M. della Libertà 33, 56127 Pisa, Italy.
Jose M Torres-RuizGroup of Irrigation and Crop Ecophysiology, Instituto de Recursos Naturales y Agrobiología, IRNAS-CSIC, Apartado 1052, 41080, Sevilla, Spain.
Jaume FlexasResearch Group in Plant Biology under Mediterranean Conditions, Universitat de les Illes Balears; Carretera de Valldemossa Km 7.5, 07122 Palma de Mallorca, Illes Balears, Spain.
José E FernándezGroup of Irrigation and Crop Ecophysiology, Instituto de Recursos Naturales y Agrobiología, IRNAS-CSIC, Apartado 1052, 41080, Sevilla, Spain.
Luca SebastianiBiolabs, ISV, Scuola Superiore Sant'Anna, Piazza M. della Libertà 33, 56127 Pisa, Italy.
Antonio Diaz-EspejoGroup of Irrigation and Crop Ecophysiology, Instituto de Recursos Naturales y Agrobiología, IRNAS-CSIC, Apartado 1052, 41080, Sevilla, Spain a.diaz@csic.es.
Instituto de Recursos Naturales y Agrobiología de Sevilla · ESScuola Superiore Sant'Anna · ITUniversitat de les Illes Balears · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The hypothesis that aquaporins and carbonic anhydrase (CA) are involved in the regulation of stomatal (g s) and mesophyll (g m) conductance to CO2 was tested in a short-term water-stress and recovery experiment in 5-year-old olive plants (Olea europaea) growing outdoors. The evolution of leaf gas exchange, chlorophyll fluorescence, and plant water status, and a quantitative analysis of photosynthesis limitations, were followed during water stress and recovery. These variables were correlated with gene expression of the aquaporins OePIP1.1 and OePIP2.1, and stromal CA. At mild stress and at the beginning of the recovery period, stomatal limitations prevailed, while the decline in g m accounted for up to 60% of photosynthesis limitations under severe water stress. However, g m was restored to control values shortly after rewatering, facilitating the recovery of the photosynthetic rate. CA was downregulated during water stress and upregulated after recovery. The use of structural equation modelling allowed us to conclude that both OePIP1.1 and OePIP2.1 expression could explain most of the variations observed for g s and g m. CA expression also had a small but significant effect on g m in olive under water-stress conditions.

Indexed as

Gene Expression Regulation, PlantAquaporinsCarbonic AnhydrasesDesiccationOleaPhotosynthesisPlant LeavesPlant StomataReal-Time Polymerase Chain ReactionReverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain ReactionAquaporinsCarbonic AnhydrasesAQPCAmesophyll conductanceOePIPOleaphotosynthesis limitationsstomatal conductancewater stress.

Identifiers

PMID24799563
PMCPMC4071832
OpenAlexW2140363323

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.