ArticleNeuro-oncology2014
Comparison of survival between the UK and US after surgery for most common pediatric CNS tumors.
Article in Neuro-oncology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 28 citations in OpenAlex.
- Worldwide Trends in Survival From Common Childhood Brain Tumors: A Systematic Review.Journal of global oncology · 2019Pooled it
- Evolving Diagnostic and Treatment Strategies for Pediatric CNS Tumors: The Impact of Lipid Metabolism.Biomedicines · 2023Review
- Mortality of central nervous system tumors in pediatric patients of Brazil from 1979 to 2019.Child's nervous system : ChNS : official journal of the International Society for Pediatric Neurosurgery · 2023Article
- Pediatric neurological cancer incidence and trends in the United States, 2000-2018.Cancer causes & control : CCC · 2022Article
- Article
- Unequal Cumulative Incidence and Mortality Outcome in Childhood Brain and Central Nervous System Malignancy in the USA.Journal of racial and ethnic health disparities · 2018Article
- Management and outcome of children and adolescents with non-medulloblastoma CNS embryonal tumors in Spain: room for improvement in standards of care.Journal of neuro-oncology · 2018Article
- Article
- Core deficits and quality of survival after childhood medulloblastoma: a review.Neuro-oncology practice · 2017Review
- Survival in pediatric medulloblastoma: a population-based observational study to improve prognostication.Journal of neuro-oncology · 2017Observational
- Incidence, time trends and survival patterns of childhood pilocytic astrocytomas in Southern-Eastern Europe and SEER, US.Journal of neuro-oncology · 2017Article
- Awake surgery for hemispheric low-grade gliomas: oncological, functional and methodological differences between pediatric and adult populations.Child's nervous system : ChNS : official journal of the International Society for Pediatric Neurosurgery · 2016Review
- Comparative Brain and Central Nervous System Tumor Incidence and Survival between the United States and Taiwan Based on Population-Based Registry.Frontiers in public health · 2016Article
- Neurosurgical treatment of brain tumors in the first 6 months of life: long-term follow-up of a single consecutive institutional series of 30 patients.Child's nervous system : ChNS : official journal of the International Society for Pediatric Neurosurgery · 2015Article
- Monitoring the changing pattern of delivery of paediatric epilepsy surgery in England--an audit of a regional service and examination of national trends.Child's nervous system : ChNS : official journal of the International Society for Pediatric Neurosurgery · 2015Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundWe report a population-based study examining long-term outcomes for common pediatric CNS tumors comparing results from the UK with the National Cancer Institute's Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) data set and with the literature. No such international study has previously been reported.
methodsData between 1996 and 2005 from the UK National Registry of Childhood Tumours (NRCT) and the SEER registry were analyzed. We calculated actuarial survival at each time point from histological diagnosis, with death from any cause as the endpoint. Kaplan-Meier estimation and log-rank testing (Cox proportional hazards regression analysis) were used to calculate survival differences among tumor subtypes, adjusting for age at diagnosis.
resultsPopulation-based outcomes for each tumor type are presented. Overall age-adjusted survival, stratifying for histology (combining pilocytic astrocytoma, anaplastic astrocytoma, glioblastoma, primitive neuroectodermal tumor, medulloblastoma, and ependymoma), is significantly lower for NRCT than SEER (hazard ratio 0.71, P < .001) and at 1, 5, and 10 years. Both NRCT and SEER outcomes are worse than those reported from trials.
conclusionAnalyzing data from comprehensive registries minimizes bias associated with trials and institutional studies. The reasons for the poorer outcomes in children treated in the UK are unclear. Likewise, the differences in outcomes between patients in trials and those not in trials need further investigation. We recommend that all children with CNS tumors be recruited into studies-even if these are observational studies. We also suggest that registries be suitably funded to publish independent outcome data (including morbidity) at both a national and an institutional level.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.