ArticleNeuropsychology2014
Simulating category learning and set shifting deficits in patients weight-restored from anorexia nervosa.
Article in Neuropsychology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed.
- Reinforcement Learning and Decision Making in Anorexia Nervosa.Current psychiatry reports · 2025Review
- Computational Perspectives on Cognition in Anorexia Nervosa: A Systematic Review.Computational psychiatry (Cambridge, Mass.) · 2025Review
- Increasing Response Vigour Under Time Pressure as a Transdiagnostic Marker of Eating Disorders.Computational psychiatry (Cambridge, Mass.) · 2025Review
- Testing the role of associative learning in evidence-based treatments for anorexia nervosa.The International journal of eating disorders · 2024Review
- Altered Reinforcement Learning from Reward and Punishment in Anorexia Nervosa: Evidence from Computational Modeling.Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society : JINS · 2022Article
- Understanding implicit and explicit learning in adolescents with and without anorexia nervosa.Journal of eating disorders · 2021Article
- Neuropsychological and Cognitive Correlates of Recovery in Anorexia Nervosa.European eating disorders review : the journal of the Eating Disorders Association · 2017Article
- Quantitative modeling of category learning deficits in various patient populations.Neuropsychology · 2017Review
- Aberrant Cerebral Blood Flow in Response to Hunger and Satiety in Women Remitted from Anorexia Nervosa.Frontiers in nutrition · 2017Article
- Literature Review of Cognitive Neuroscience and Anorexia Nervosa.Current psychiatry reports · 2016Review
- Multiple stages of learning in perceptual categorization: evidence and neurocomputational theory.Psychonomic bulletin & review · 2015Review
- Application of the Research Domain Criteria (RDoC) framework to eating disorders: emerging concepts and research.Current psychiatry reports · 2015Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveTo examine set shifting in a group of women previously diagnosed with anorexia nervosa who are now weight-restored (AN-WR) and then apply a biologically based computational model (Competition between Verbal and Implicit Systems [COVIS]) to simulate the pattern of category learning and set shifting performances observed.
methodNineteen AN-WR women and 35 control women (CW) were administered an explicit category learning task that required rule acquisition and then a set shift following a rule change. COVIS was first fit to the behavioral results of the controls and then parameters of the model theoretically relevant to AN were altered to mimic the behavioral results.
resultsRelative to CW, the AN-WR group displayed steeper learning curves (i.e., hyper learning) before the rule shift, but greater difficulty in learning the new categories after the rule shift (i.e., a deficit in set shifting). Hyper learning and set shifting deficits in the AN-WR group were not associated and differentially correlated with clinical measures. Hyper learning in the AN-WR group was simulated by increasing the model parameter that represents sensitivity to negative feedback (δ parameter), whereas the deficit in set shifting was simulated by altering the parameters that represent changes in rule selection and flexibility (λ and γ parameters, respectively).
conclusionsThese simulations suggest that multiple factors can impact category learning and set shifting in AN-WR individuals (e.g., alterations in sensitivity to negative feedback, rule selection deficits, and inflexibility) and provide an important starting point to further investigate this pervasive deficit in adult AN.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.